The sign of Satan “Khomeini” exposed from his book “Kashaful Asrar”

We have collected some references from the book of Khomeini “Kashaful Asrar” for the Sunni Muslims who are deceived by the Shias that Khomeini was a person who wanted unity between Shias and Sunnis and similar stuff. Khomeini abused Prophet (s) and his sahaba in his book “Kashaful Asrar” in the worst way possible.

Khomeini writes regarding the third Caliph Uthman:

We worship that God and recognise only Him as God whose acts are based on mature wisdom and who does not do anything against the dictates of wisdom. Nor do we recognise such God who having built the edifice of justice and piety on the exalted foundation of devotion to God, Himself paves the way for its destruction and ruin, and hands over leadership and governance to such oppressors and scoundrels as Yazeed, Mu’awiyah and Uthman.

Kashaful Asrar, p. 107

Than Khomeini titles a chapter “Abu Bakr’s opposition to Quran”

Under this heading, Khomeini says: “If you hold that in case the Caliphate and Imamate of Hazrat Ali had been mentioned, in so many words, in the Quran, Shaykhain (i.e Abu Bakr and Umar) could not go against it, and if they tried to do so, the general body of Muslims would not have tolerated it (then it would be pure wishful thinking). We will give a few examples, here, of how they acted and gave decisions in open violation of the dictates of the Quran and the Muslims accepted them and not a voice of protest was raised.”

Kashaful Asrar, p. 114-115

Than Khomeini titles the next chapter “Umar’s opposition to Quran”

He says ” Here we will mention Umar’s opposition to Quran and will show that opposition to Quran was not a huge thing for him. And if the word “Imam” had been clearly mentioned in the Quran, he would still have opposed it.”

Kashaful Asrar, p. 117

Than after he mentions Hadith-e-Qirtas (Tradition of the Paper), and after referring to the traditional Shi’ite interpretation of the remark made by Hazrat Omar on that occasion, he says:

“this absurd remark showed the kufr (i.e disbelief) and heterodoxy of the person who is opposed to so many verses of the Quran”.

Kashaful Asrar, p. 119

The doomed Khomeini says the Prophet (s) was afraid in preaching the Imamate of Ali because of the opposition party, indirectly labelling Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman and others as the opposition party, and says they were hungry for the government, rather he says they embraced Islam for this very purpose.

“From these evidences and large number of ahadith, we come to know that the Prophet (s) feared the people regarding the preaching of Imamate (of Ali). And if someone reads the books of history and reports, he will understand that the Prophet’s (fear) had a valid reason. But God had ordered him to convey it and He had promised his safety and he (i.e the Prophet) had conveyed it too and he struggled for it till his end, but the opposition party didn’t let him accomplish his job.”
Kashaful Asrar, p. 130-131

Than while answering to the question that why don’t we see the Imamate of the twelve infallibles in the Quran, he says:

“Suppose the name of the Imam i.e., Hazrat Ali had been mentioned in the Quran to succeed the Prophet (peace be upon him), how did it follow that there would have been no dispute in the Ummat over Imamate and Caliphate ? Those who had associated themselves closely with the Prophet’s faith, i.e., Islam for years and remained attached to it out of greed for power and yet had been conspiring and sowing discord and factionalism to play their game, would they have bowed before the pronouncement of the Quran and abandoned their plan and objective. Would they not have gone to any length of fraud and subterfuge to attain their aim? Probably, in that event, a dispute of such a dimension would have arisen in the Ummat that the very foundations of Islam would have been destroyed for it was very likely that those who had accepted Islam solely for the sake of coming into power would have openly resiled from it when they saw that they could not gain their end by remaining associated with it, and confronted it as enemies.”

Kashaful Asrar, p. 113-114

Khomeini then sums up after putting forth the allegations on the three Caliphs and other Sahaba in the following words:

“The result of our discussion in this regard : We come to know from the examples we have presented that oppostion to the Quran openly amongst the Muslims or secretly was not an extraordinary thing for Shaykhain (Abu Bakr and Umar). The condition of the Muslims at that time was such that they were either included in their party for acquiring government, and if they weren’t in their party , still they couldn’t dare to say a single word against those who had oppressed Prophet and his daughter.”

Kashaful Asrar, p. 119

Perhaps this was the reason that he once declared his companions to be far better than the companions of Prophet (peace be upon him).

After all these proofs, can we still have some respect for this doomed Khomeini? We have unveiled the satan from his very own book, and now the proof has been firmly established that this doomed Khomeini deserves no respect from any sane Muslim. The Shias will still practice taqiyah and defend this doomed person, but this article is only for the Sunni Muslims, who are fooled by the Shias that Khomeini was a flag bearer of unity between Shias and Muslims. Rather he abused the Prophet (s) and the blessed Sahaba in the worst way possible. May Allah punish the doomed Khomeini in his grave and in hell forever.


35 thoughts on “The sign of Satan “Khomeini” exposed from his book “Kashaful Asrar”

    1. zaheerhusainZAHEERHUSAINKHAN

      WHOEVER CALLS AYATOLLAH AL UZMAH KHOMAINI R A MA’AZ ALLAH SATAN IS HIMSELF A CONFIRMED ILLEGITIMATE BECASUE EXCEPT A BASTARD NO ONE CAN CALL SUCH A GREAT ISLAMIC LEADER .HIS EFFORTS FOR UNITY BETWEEN THE SECTS IS THE SOURCE OF YOUR HATRED FOR THE GLOBAL LEADER OF ISLAM AS YOU LOVE ONLY TERRORISM , TARGET KILLINGS AND SUICIDE BOMBINGS , LA’AN ON YOU AND YOU MUNAFEQEEN HEROES .

      Reply
    2. abe parker

      you say hes a kaafir but you havent read his reasons? nor has the author of this site taken the honest trouble to provide you with it?

      Reply
      1. Who Are The Shia?

        I honestly do not understand why the Shia think of Khomeini as an Islamic leader? What has he done for Islam? Khomeini has done nothing for Islam.

        Look at the website link provided about his origins. Be logical for a minute when you read.

        If Shia is the TRUTH, then why is it that every IRANIAN SHIA the moment they arrive in America or Germany or France they declare OPENLY and call themselves either a Christian, Jew or an Atheist? EVER WONDER WHY? YOU AS a person of intellect ever WONDER WHY? How can a sane person leave his religion if it is the TRUTH? How can a sane person then therefore leave Christianity if they are the truth? How can sane person leave Hinduism if they are the truth? OF COURSE you take your time to educate yourself you end up finding the TRUTH about it and the more you find the truth about them, the more you are going to hate it.

        Abdullah ibn Saba, did you guys all forgot about him? The Khawarij during the time of Ali radi Allahu an and those who killed him, did you all of a sudden forgot about that?

      2. zaheerhusainZAHEERHUSAINKHAN

        TRUTH IS ALWAYS BITTER . HATRED IS SHOWN IN WAHABI DOMINATED PAKISTAN , , SAUDI-YAHOODI INFESTED BAHARAIN, AND THE SAME TAKFEERI INVADED SYRIA
        SUUNISM , THE MOAVIAN CULT DOMINATE THE ISLAMIC WORLD THAT IS WHY THERE IS TROUBLE EVERY WHERE .

  1. hassanaskari1

    Awesome work brother for exposing this kafir khumeni the lier who decieved the Muslims in the name shiasunni unity , now he is exposed what a lier and kazzab he was. khumeni lanatullahialai

    Reply
  2. Cabdul Wahaab

    JazakAllahu Khayran.

    Khomeini was a cancer to earth.

    He got what he deserved in his funeral
    when the people that loved him misstakly took his sheets off,
    then stempin on him unaware.

    And now InshaAllah he is burning in an eternal fire.

    Reply
  3. Mubashir Hussain

    khumeni was a shaitan and still many khumenies present in many countries,,.they are not just a kaafir but worst kaafir of the world.he had gone to hell and his followers

    Reply
  4. Muhammad Sani

    i dont think d man-Khomeini was really “wrong” afterall he was propagating his religion called Rafidhi/Shi’sm (a religion based on fables and stories/satitires against islam). The actual problem started when one assumes/accepts them the shites as part of Islam.

    Reply
  5. Sabeeha Baig

    Astaghfirullah I was trembling while reading I’m sure khomeni is in hell and his followers will also b there with him soon

    Reply
  6. Shaheed

    May Allaah increase the punishments of d grave of Khumeini

    May he neva perceive d odor of jannah
    Amiin thumma Amiin

    Reply
    1. zaheerhusain

      باطل سے برات کا سبق دے گیا ہم کو

      افکار کے تابندہ اُفق دے گیا ہم کو
      اذہان کی گلرنگ شفق دے گیا ہم کو

      اسلام کی عظمت کے بتا کر ہمیں اسرار
      باطل سے برات کا سبق دے گیا ہم کو

      اس دین کی اقدار کو آئین بنا کر
      فردوس میں جانے کا ورق دے گیا ہم کو

      پینے سے نظر آتی ہے جنت کی گذرگاہ
      اس چشمۂ حیواں کا عرق دے گیا ہم کو

      ہے ذائقہ ایسا کہ لبوں پر من وسلویٰ
      روحانی غذاؤں کا طبق دے گیا ہم کو

      مسدود ہوئی جاتی تھیں اسلام کی راہیں
      تابندہ شریعت کا سبق دے گیا ہم کو

      THAT WAS THE AYATOLLAH THE GREAT ,
      BURN YOU INFIDELS IN ENVY WITH YOUR TRIPLE IDIOTS .

      Reply
  7. zaheerhusain

    Burn in hatred you all khabees worshippers of the three Idiots who were shaitaan in the garb of
    munafeqeen . Their Kufr is obvious by the fact that they ran away from the Ghazwas leaving their Leader seriously injured almost dying . Qora’an e kareem specific verse declares such deserters as apostate , unbeleiver and Jahannumi .
    It is indeed the reverend Ayatollah marhoom wa maghfoor’s magnanimity that despite knowing well that no praise of any kind they deserve , the grand Ayatollah made it mandatory on their followers not to speak ill about these figures in public , which does not mean don’t speak, tell or write history and truth.about whom Sunnis are grossly misguided to consider them of any merit on earth .I don’t blame them for what the learnd from their parents, maoulvis and grossly fabri-cated books recorded 200 years later after Mohammad (saaws)
    What do YOU say to your own Mother of beleiver who as per your own narrations , declared the third as NATHAL and Wajibul Qatl . And see your own foolishness that the greatest EVIL of his Time , your Moaviah Maloun , whose son of the same nature as his father and who inhallated the whole family and friends of the Farzand e Rasool (saaws) , you dare to suffix their name with R A A while he brutally killed her and her brother , the son of your fake Khalifah No. 1.
    Razi Allah , though they deserve only La’anat Allah Anho .
    Really you have no shame what to say any aqeedah of real Islaam though through freak of fate accupy the greater part of this filthy world and adminsteer the holiest of the holy place , the Harmain — Shareefain..

    Reply
    1. Micheal

      where were shia when Hussain & his family were being killed in the desert of karbala, after all they were in great majoriy there and they invited him to come by writing him one million letters. Any idea?

      Reply
  8. abe parker

    wow!! you guys really are fakes, the quran castigated harshly many sahaba who opposed the prophet sawa on many occasions, is and was the author of the quran wrong? nauthubillah!! then there are many sunni hadith where one sahabi calls the other liar regarding narrating hadith in the name of the prophet sawa, then tens of thousands sahaba killed each other, are the killer and killed both in jannah? are they all absolved of being killers? then you have sunni hadith which says maaaany sahaba go to jahanam because they deviated after prophet sawa, since you cant call prophet sawa anything bad why dont you call these narrators or collectors of hadith kaafir etc as you do above?

    Reply
  9. zaheerhusain

    Janab Parkar Sahab , Please don’t waste your time , these deviant worshippers of the evil shaikhains will never understand , their minds have been SEALD which will open up when after the judgement they will feel the heat and their fat will melt .
    They should have regarded the most respected Ayatollah Khomain i Rehmat Allah, their savior as there is no doubt that the reverend Ayotallah did lot of efforts in bringing the two warring sects togather , but these meanest sunnies because of their filthy lineage will never see reason . Indeed they are the fuel of Jahannum .

    Reply
  10. Koala

    I am sunni but I cannot understand the amount of hatred towards shia and imam Khomeini by some sunnis subhanallah. Early days of Islam were difficult times and there are indeed several interpretations of some events and we should be able to allow everybody to express their opinion. Sahaba, as much as we love them, were not saints or sinless. There are no saints in Islam. There are things that we know they erred and made serious mistakes.
    If you point out to these excerpts from imam Khomeini’s book and call him sheythan or disbeliever then what should one say about sunnis looking at Osama bin Laden or the state of the faith in Saudi Arabia for example? Please be more tolerant. We are all muslims.

    Reply
    1. zaheerhusain

      ABU HORAIRAH KAZZAB FABRICATED A LOT OF SO CALLED AHADEES , SOME OF THEM AS VALGUR AS PORN AND ALONG WITH HIM A SCORE OF OTHERS IN COLLISION WITH SON OF ABU SOFIYAN (L A) MOAVIAH MALOUN FOUNDED A CULT WHICH IN FACT WAS A VERY UGLY CARICATURE OF ISLAM , AND THEY NAMED IT AHLE SUNNAH WAL JAMA’A . HE WAS APPOINTED GOVERNOR BY THE SON OF AN ILLEGITIMATE USURPER RULER WHOSE LINEAGE HAS BEEN VERY EXPLICTLY DESCRIBED BY A SUNNI WRITER IN HIS BOOK AL SALABATA FI MAREFATAH AL SAHABAH BY MOHAMMAD AL SAEB AL KALBI ABOUT THE MOST FILTHY LINEAGE AND THE PACK OF MUNAFEQEEN MADE HIMM NOT ONLY THE 2ND RULER BUT ALSO A HOPEFULL WHO COULD HAVE BEEN A PROPHET IF THERE WAS ONE AFTER THE KHATIM UL NABOOWAT (SAAWS) .AYATOLLAH KHOMAINI REHMATALLAH WAS TOO NOBLE , TOO KIND THAT HE PERCIEVED AN IDEA THAT THERE CAN BE A UNITY BETWEEN THE SHAITAAN CULT AHLE SUNNAH WITH THE DEEN OF REAL ISLAM OF AHLEBAYT E RASOOL (S).. CAN ANY BODY THINK A UNITY AND DOSTI BETWEEN SUNNI IBLEES AND SHIA JIBRAEIL .YOU ARE RIGHT ABOUT MOST SAHABAH WHEN YOU SAY THEY WERE NOT SAINTS OR SINLESS , BUT IF YOU HAD ANY KNOWLEDGE OF QORA’AN , YOU WOULD HAVE KNOWN WHAT ALLAH PROCLAIMED ABOUT THE AHLEBAYT E RASOOL (S) IN THE AYA E TATHEER Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 17:14:43 +0000 To: zaheerhusain@hotmail.com

      Reply
  11. sui 123

    Satanist Shias!!!Don’t lie and talk crap…Subhannalah I saw the crap you too were posting….Arent you ashamed of being Shia?Your entire Muttah Cult is based in lies and Fables…If we listen to the rubbish you Shia believe that means Ali RA and Hussain RA were cowards and liars..they use to make taqiyyah…they were promiscuous and use to sleep around…your filthy cult sais that’s the Sunnah of Ali RA!May Allah punish you deviant fire worshipers…Your 1st Imam is Abdullah Ibn Saba

    Reply
    1. zaheerhusain

      ALL THOSE WHO CALL THE GREATEST & NOBLEST PERSON ON THE GLOBE IN RECENT YEARS , AYATOLLAH KHOMAINI r a a , BUT SUUNIS WERE NOT SUCH RABIDS TILL SOME DECADES BACK . MANY OF THEM HAD LOVE FOR AHLEBAYT (a) AND PARTICIPATED IN THE MOURNINGS OF THE RASOOL’S PROGENY PARTICULARLY IMAM HUSAIN (a s).
      THE RISE OF THE WAHABI SALAFI HAPPENED ONLY LESS THAN A CENTURY BACK . NEJDI MONEY AND THE LURE OF CRIME & TERRORISM IS DECAYING THEM .
      EVEN THE GREAT EFFORTS THE AYATOLLAH REALLY DID IS NOT APPRECIATED BY THEM NOW. IT IS UNIMAGINABLE HE EVER SAID ANY THING OBJECTIONABLE AGAINST THE PROPHET (s) , HOWEVER HOW COULD HE HAVE IGNORED THE CRIMES OF USURPING, TERRORISM AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACIES OF THE KHOLAFA E SALASAH ON WHICH THE ATTEMPT WAS TO KEEP IT UNDER WRAPS HIDDEN UNDER A BIG VEIL, HOWEVER THE FREE PRESS , ACCESS TO INFO THROUGH EASEIR PRINT MEDIA , INTERNET , FILM AND VIDEO HAS EXPOSED THEIR CHARACTERS NAKED , SO THE SUNNAH WAL JAMA’A HAVE NO ALTERNATIVE LEFT , BUT TO RESORT TO ABUSE THE SHIAS AND REFUSE EVERY TRUTH .
      JUST TELL ME WHAT BAD TRAITS WERE NOT THERE IN ONE OF THEM OR THE OTHER . THOROUGH LIES , RUFFIANISM , GOONDAISM, BAD MANNERS , EMBEZZLEMENTS, CONS-PIRACIES , MURDERS & TERRORISM , YOU ASK FOR A VICE AND THEY HAD IT . THOUGH
      THEY ARE SAID TO BE VERY CLOSE TO THE RASOOL(s) BUT DID NOT PICKED UP ANY GOOD , REBELLED THE MOMENT THE PROPHET OF ISLAM CLOSED HIS EYES & TURNED APOSTATE . EVEN DURING HIS LIFE TIME THEY APPOSED ON CERTAIN MATTERS, ABUSED AND IGNORED HIS (s) ORDERS . SO WHAT IF THE REVEREND AYATOLLAH HIGHLIGHTED
      THEIR CRIMES HOWEVER IT CANNOT BE DENIED THAT HE SINCERELY MADE EFFORTS TO BRING DOWN RECONCILLIATION BETWEEN THE 2 MAJOR SECTS OF ISLAM .

      Reply
  12. Moe Lats

    KHOMEINI IS A SATANIST…SHIASM IS THE RELIGION OF SATINSM…THEY CAN HAVE SEX WITH RANDOM WOMAN…THEY SAY ZINNAH IS FOR ALLAHS PLEASURE…THEY CUT THEMSELVES…THEY LIE…THEY KILL MUSLIMS…THEY SAY NABI SAW.IS A FAILURE…IN MY COUNTRY SHIA KILL MUSLIM WHO NAME AFTER SAHABA…SHIAS ARE SATANISM

    Reply
    1. zaheerhusain

      AYOTALLAH KHOMAINI (a r ) WAS THE MOST NOBLE PERSON BORN IN THIS ERA . BADI MUSHKIL SAY HOTA HAI JAHAN MAIN DEEDAWAR PAIDAH .
      SHIA IS ONLY AN IDENTITY , SHIA MEANS FOLLOWERS OF ALI IBNE ABI TALIB (a) . AFTER THE DEMISE OF RASOOL E AKRAM (s) MOST SAHABAS REBELLED , TURNED THEIR HEELS INNOVATED AND AMMENDED ISLAM TO CONSOLIDATE THEIR ILLEGITIMATE , ILLEGAL RULE , APPOINTED MOAVIAH WHO FOUNDED A CULT ,CARICATURE OF ISLAM . THIS WAS CALLED AHLE SUNNAH WAL JAMA’A .
      THERE IS A MINORITY WHO ADHERED TO REAL ISLAM THEY ARE THE REAL ISLAM . NO ONE IS PERFECT EXCEPT THE AAL E MOHAMMAD (s) WHO ARE IMMACULATE AND INFALLIBLE .SHIAS TRY TO FOLLOW THEIR DICTATES , THEY ARE GUIDED BY THEM .

      SUNNAH FOLLOWSTHE DEVIATED , MISGUIDED SAHABAS GONE APPOSTATE , MANY WERE SO WEAK IN EIMAN THAT AT THE LEAST DANGERS TO THEIR SELF THEY FLEE GHAZWAS , AS PER QORA’AN THEY BECAME UNBELIEVERS , JAHANNUMIS , SUNNIES ARE THEIR FOLLOWERS , RATHER WORSHIP THEM , THUS THERE IS THE BIG DIVIDE OF ASL-ISLAM AND AHLE SUNN AH , KASSERAH (MAJORITY) IS ALWAYS ASTRAY , NOT ME , IT IS QORA’AN SAYS, BUT HOW WOULD YOU POOR SUNNIS KNOW , FOR YOU IT IS ONLY TO ROTE AND CRAM BECOME A HAFIZ MULLAH JEE DONT EVEN PERFORM THE WAZO SO CLEARLY GIVEN IN SURA E MAEDAH . CAN YOU EVER REFLECT OR ONCE THE BUZURGS (elders) COMMITTED A MISTAKE IT WILL CONTINUE TILL QAYAMAH .OK GO ON WASHING LEGS AGAINST MASAH , WHAT HAPPENS TO YOUR NAMAAZ ALLAH KNOWS , HE WILL GIVE THE AJR OF ”YOGA”.

      Reply
  13. Micheal

    I have yet to understand that ,when Hussain was hungry , thirsty , having nothing to eat , not for him , nor for his family, the shia instead of fasting , they make hundereds of different kind of food items everyday during Muharam and eat it in mixed gatherings , laughs and jokes . They beat themselves till the day Hussain was alive,i.e 10th of muharam. On the 10th day ,when Hussain and his family were killed , rather mourning, shia will pack up and leave for their homes. Its the day , they should start mourning Hussain & family massacre by the ex-governor to Ali and by his step brother but souns like they were happy by killing Hussain and family
    .

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s