The sign of Satan “Khomeini” exposed from his book “Kashaful Asrar”

We have collected some references from the book of Khomeini “Kashaful Asrar” for the Sunni Muslims who are deceived by the Shias that Khomeini was a person who wanted unity between Shias and Sunnis and similar stuff. Khomeini abused Prophet (s) and his sahaba in his book “Kashaful Asrar” in the worst way possible.

Khomeini writes regarding the third Caliph Uthman:

We worship that God and recognise only Him as God whose acts are based on mature wisdom and who does not do anything against the dictates of wisdom. Nor do we recognise such God who having built the edifice of justice and piety on the exalted foundation of devotion to God, Himself paves the way for its destruction and ruin, and hands over leadership and governance to such oppressors and scoundrels as Yazeed, Mu’awiyah and Uthman.

Kashaful Asrar, p. 107

Than Khomeini titles a chapter “Abu Bakr’s opposition to Quran”

Under this heading, Khomeini says: “If you hold that in case the Caliphate and Imamate of Hazrat Ali had been mentioned, in so many words, in the Quran, Shaykhain (i.e Abu Bakr and Umar) could not go against it, and if they tried to do so, the general body of Muslims would not have tolerated it (then it would be pure wishful thinking). We will give a few examples, here, of how they acted and gave decisions in open violation of the dictates of the Quran and the Muslims accepted them and not a voice of protest was raised.”

Kashaful Asrar, p. 114-115

Than Khomeini titles the next chapter “Umar’s opposition to Quran”

He says ” Here we will mention Umar’s opposition to Quran and will show that opposition to Quran was not a huge thing for him. And if the word “Imam” had been clearly mentioned in the Quran, he would still have opposed it.”

Kashaful Asrar, p. 117

Than after he mentions Hadith-e-Qirtas (Tradition of the Paper), and after referring to the traditional Shi’ite interpretation of the remark made by Hazrat Omar on that occasion, he says:

“this absurd remark showed the kufr (i.e disbelief) and heterodoxy of the person who is opposed to so many verses of the Quran”.

Kashaful Asrar, p. 119

The doomed Khomeini says the Prophet (s) was afraid in preaching the Imamate of Ali because of the opposition party, indirectly labelling Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman and others as the opposition party, and says they were hungry for the government, rather he says they embraced Islam for this very purpose.

“From these evidences and large number of ahadith, we come to know that the Prophet (s) feared the people regarding the preaching of Imamate (of Ali). And if someone reads the books of history and reports, he will understand that the Prophet’s (fear) had a valid reason. But God had ordered him to convey it and He had promised his safety and he (i.e the Prophet) had conveyed it too and he struggled for it till his end, but the opposition party didn’t let him accomplish his job.”
Kashaful Asrar, p. 130-131

Than while answering to the question that why don’t we see the Imamate of the twelve infallibles in the Quran, he says:

“Suppose the name of the Imam i.e., Hazrat Ali had been mentioned in the Quran to succeed the Prophet (peace be upon him), how did it follow that there would have been no dispute in the Ummat over Imamate and Caliphate ? Those who had associated themselves closely with the Prophet’s faith, i.e., Islam for years and remained attached to it out of greed for power and yet had been conspiring and sowing discord and factionalism to play their game, would they have bowed before the pronouncement of the Quran and abandoned their plan and objective. Would they not have gone to any length of fraud and subterfuge to attain their aim? Probably, in that event, a dispute of such a dimension would have arisen in the Ummat that the very foundations of Islam would have been destroyed for it was very likely that those who had accepted Islam solely for the sake of coming into power would have openly resiled from it when they saw that they could not gain their end by remaining associated with it, and confronted it as enemies.”

Kashaful Asrar, p. 113-114

Khomeini then sums up after putting forth the allegations on the three Caliphs and other Sahaba in the following words:

“The result of our discussion in this regard : We come to know from the examples we have presented that oppostion to the Quran openly amongst the Muslims or secretly was not an extraordinary thing for Shaykhain (Abu Bakr and Umar). The condition of the Muslims at that time was such that they were either included in their party for acquiring government, and if they weren’t in their party , still they couldn’t dare to say a single word against those who had oppressed Prophet and his daughter.”

Kashaful Asrar, p. 119

Perhaps this was the reason that he once declared his companions to be far better than the companions of Prophet (peace be upon him).

After all these proofs, can we still have some respect for this doomed Khomeini? We have unveiled the satan from his very own book, and now the proof has been firmly established that this doomed Khomeini deserves no respect from any sane Muslim. The Shias will still practice taqiyah and defend this doomed person, but this article is only for the Sunni Muslims, who are fooled by the Shias that Khomeini was a flag bearer of unity between Shias and Muslims. Rather he abused the Prophet (s) and the blessed Sahaba in the worst way possible. May Allah punish the doomed Khomeini in his grave and in hell forever.


98 thoughts on “The sign of Satan “Khomeini” exposed from his book “Kashaful Asrar”

    1. zaheerhusainZAHEERHUSAINKHAN

      WHOEVER CALLS AYATOLLAH AL UZMAH KHOMAINI R A MA’AZ ALLAH SATAN IS HIMSELF A CONFIRMED ILLEGITIMATE BECASUE EXCEPT A BASTARD NO ONE CAN CALL SUCH A GREAT ISLAMIC LEADER .HIS EFFORTS FOR UNITY BETWEEN THE SECTS IS THE SOURCE OF YOUR HATRED FOR THE GLOBAL LEADER OF ISLAM AS YOU LOVE ONLY TERRORISM , TARGET KILLINGS AND SUICIDE BOMBINGS , LA’AN ON YOU AND YOU MUNAFEQEEN HEROES .

      Reply
      1. Nazeen Khan

        Bastards are those who curse our beloved Sahaba (r.a) and you are your shiataan khomani is the one of them…. You mutah/zinah players have always been a backstabbers in Islam and have been desecrating it slow and steadily But Allhandullilah you people have been exposed and will need to be exposed much…We love Targetting you people jews are next but you are more Dangerous jews…

      2. zaheerhusain khan

        THE THREE SAHABAH ARE CURSED BECAUSE THEY SCHEMED , POISONED THE PROPHET OF ISLAM(saaws), CONFISCATED THE RIGHTFUL KHILAFAH OF HIS COUSIN AND DECLARED SUCCESSOR,CONFISCATED HIS PROPERTY GIFTED TO HIS ONLY DAUGHTER,  MADE A TERRORIST ATTACK ON THE DOOR OF FATEMA (s) ON WHICH DOOR IT WAS THE ROUTINE OF PROPHET TO COME IN THE MORNING AND BLESS ALL HIS DAUGHTER’S FAMILY. IF SUCH CRIMINALS, BAD CHARACTERS , FLEERS OF GHAZWAS LEAVING THE RASOOL ALONE & ALMOST DYING , IF MUSLIMS DO NOT CURSE , SEND ALLAH’S LA’ANAT ON, WHAT THEY SHOULD DO ? ,EULOGIZE THEM OR PRAY FOR THEIR PARDON . EVEN JANAB SAIYEDDAH SAID ” I SHALL NOT DOA FOR YOU & SHALL COMPLAIN ABOUT YOU 2 WHEN I MEET ”. SHE HAD TO SAY ” IF SUCH CALAMITY WAS FALLEN DUE TO THEM AS ON DAY , IT WOULD HAVE TURNED TO NIGHT. THIS IS A FIGURE OF SPEECH FOR UNTOLD ZULM ON HER , AND ON WHOM , THE ONLY DAUGHTER OF THE RASOOL (s)  WHICH  DID RESULTED IN HER UNTIMELY DEATH .THESE ZALEMEEN  ARE NOT LIABLE TO BE CURSED .   zaheer husain khan  

      3. zaheerhusain

        THE THREE SAHABAH ARE CURSED BECAUSE THEY SCHEMED , POISONED THE PROPHET OF ISLAM(saaws), CONFISCATED THE RIGHTFUL KHILAFAH OF HIS COUSIN AND DECLARED SUCCESSOR,CONFISCATED HIS PROPERTY GIFTED TO HIS ONLY DAUGHTER, MADE A TERRORIST ATTACK ON THE DOOR OF FATEMA (s) ON WHICH DOOR IT WAS THE ROUTINE OF PROPHET TO COME IN THE MORNING AND BLESS ALL HIS DAUGHTER’S FAMILY.
        IF SUCH CRIMINALS, BAD CHARACTERS , FLEERS OF GHAZWAS LEAVING THE RASOOL ALONE & ALMOST DYING , IF MUSLIMS DO NOT CURSE , SEND ALLAH’S LA’ANAT ON, WHAT THEY SHOULD DO ? ,EULOGIZE THEM OR PRAY FOR THEIR PARDON . EVEN JANAB SAIYEDDAH SAID ” I SHALL NOT DOA FOR YOU & SHALL COMPLAIN ABOUT YOU 2 WHEN I MEET ”. SHE HAD TO SAY ” IF SUCH CALAMITY WAS FALLEN DUE TO THEM AS ON DAY , IT WOULD HAVE TURNED TO NIGHT. THIS IS A FIGURE OF SPEECH FOR UNTOLD ZULM ON HER , AND ON WHOM , THE ONLY DAUGHTER OF THE RASOOL (s) WHICH
        DID RESULTED IN HER UNTIMELY DEATH .THESE ZALEMEEN
        ARE NOT LIABLE TO BE CURSED .
        THE REAL BASTARD AND WALLIDDUZZINAH IS WHOM WHO HAVE ANY REVERENCE, SYMPATHY OR REGARDS FOR SUCH MUNAFEQEEN , ZALEMEEN AND KAFFEREEN . ONLY FLEEING FROM GHAZWAS MADE THEM KAFFIR AND JAHANNUMI .

      4. zaheerhusain

        NAZEEN KHAN, ARE YOU NOT AWARE OF THE DASTARDLY CRIMES THE THREE SAHABA , YOU CALL BELOVED ,COMMITTED . IT IS HISTORY, THEY SCHEMED TO KILL THE RASOOL BY POISIONING, WHEN THE MISSION ACCOMPLISHED THEY DIDNT GO TO WAR ON FLIMSY PRETEX AS WERE COMMANDED BY THE RASOOL (saaws)BUT PLAYED A DRAMA OF UNCALLED FOR ELECTION WHILE THE RASOOL LAY DEAD AND AWAITIG BURIAL WHICH THEY DID NOT ATTEND NOR PRAYED THE NAMAZ E JANAZH INSTEAD SELECTED WITHOUT PROPER ELECTION THE MOST KAZIB ABU BAKR , HE THEN ORDERED UMAR THE SON OF AN ILLEGITIMATE IBNE ILLEGITIMATE KHATTAB REF.(mohd al saeb al kalbi a sunni famous writer in his book al salabatah fi marfatah sahabah)
        TO GO AND TAKE ALLEGIANCE FROM ALI IBNE ABI TALIB (a s) IN CASE HE REFUSES KILL HIM . UMAR CAME WITH HIS 11 THUGS BEARING BURNING LOGS, TORCHED THE DOO OF NABI’S ONLY DAUGHTER , INJURED HER SERIOUSLY HAVING LOST HER UNBORN CHILD AND HERSELF SUCCUMBED TO THE INJURIES INFLICTE BY THE ZALIM TERRORIST .

        THE 3RD RULER ALSO A USURPER OF KHILAFAT E MAULA ALI WAS BRANDED BY THE MOTHER OF BELIEVER, A MAN GONE ASTRAY, UNBELIEVER AND WAJIBUL QATL , MURDERED SOON HE WAS , THEY SAY ON HER BEHEST BY TALHA -ZUBAIR . WALLAH AALAM . THESE ALL STATEMENTS ARE PART OF HISTORY WHICH WAS SUPPRESSED AND NOW IS OUT AND HAVE BEEN RECORDED BY MANY SUNNI NARRATORS FROM WHICH I HAVE MENTIONED.

      5. zaheerhusain

        NAZEEN KHAN, ARE YOU NOT AWARE OF THE DASTARDLY CRIMES THE THREE SAHABA , YOU CALL BELOVED ,COMMITTED . IT IS HISTORY, THEY SCHEMED TO KILL THE RASOOL BY POISIONING, WHEN THE MISSION ACCOMPLISHED THEY DIDNT GO TO WAR ON FLIMSY PRETEX AS WERE COMMANDED BY THE RASOOL (saaws)BUT PLAYED A DRAMA OF UNCALLED FOR ELECTION WHILE THE RASOOL LAY DEAD AND AWAITIG BURIAL WHICH THEY DID NOT ATTEND NOR PRAYED THE NAMAZ E JANAZH INSTEAD SELECTED WITHOUT PROPER ELECTION THE MOST KAZIB ABU BAKR , HE THEN ORDERED UMAR THE SON OF AN ILLEGITIMATE IBNE ILLEGITIMATE KHATTAB REF.(mohd al saeb al kalbi a sunni famous writer in his book al salabatah fi marfatah sahabah)TO GO AND TAKE ALLEGIANCE FROM ALI IBNE ABI TALIB (a s) IN CASE HE REFUSES KILL HIM . UMAR CAME WITH HIS 11 THUGS BEARING BURNING LOGS, TORCHED THE DOOR OF NABI’S ONLY DAUGHTER , INJURED HER SERIOUSLY HAVING LOST HER UNBORN CHILD AND HERSELF SUCCUMBED TO THE INJURIES INFLICTED BY THE ZALIM TERRORIST . THE 3RD RULER ALSO A USURPER OF KHILAFAT E MAULA ALI WAS BRANDED BY THE MOTHER OF BELIEVER, ” A MAN GONE ASTRAY, UNBELIEVER AND WAJIBUL QATL” , MURDERED SOON HE WAS , THEY SAY ON HER BEHEST BY TALHA -ZUBAIR . WALLAH AALAM . THESE ALL STATEMENTS ARE PART OF HISTORY WHICH WAS SUPPRESSED AND NOW IS OUT AND HAVE BEEN RECORDED BY MANY SUNNI NARRATORS FROM WHICH I HAVE MENTIONED. BETTER STUDY & RESEARCH , CONSULT YOUR AALIM THEN REPLY WITH PROOF . Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 19:10:13 +0000 To: zaheerhusain@hotmail.com

      6. Syed Hassaan Ali Shah Bukhari

        Hahaha, the bastard who abused Allah and the Prophet and His blessed Sahaba is the standard bearer of unity between Sunnis and Shia. He encourages shia to pray behind sunni imams but in return curse their religion huh. Fear Allah or u will be totally doomed on the day of judgement. What reasons will present to Allah when Allah and his Prophet will ask u why u sypported a **? U have time to repent. Leave the history of false allegations and narrations against such pious souls and enter the true religion of the Prophet and Hazrat Ali. May Allah show u the true path. Ameen

      7. Muhammed Ali Razavi

        Zaheer Hussain@

        Khomeni (upon him is curse of Allah) did not work for unity of Ummah. He was a Kafir and anyone who defends him and loves him -: For what he taught and knowing what he taught is also Kafir. In light of Sayyidi Ala Hadhrat’s Fatawah: Khomeni and all Rawafid are Kafir. The slaughtered animal of Rawafid is Haram and it is permissible for a Muslim to wash the utensil in which a dog or a khanzir (pig) has eaten something and use it. But it is haram for a Muslim to use that utensil even after washing if a Rafidi has used it. Nikkah with a Rafidi women is invalid and sexual relationships with her are Zina and to be punished as such.

    2. abe parker

      you say hes a kaafir but you havent read his reasons? nor has the author of this site taken the honest trouble to provide you with it?

      Reply
      1. Who Are The Shia?

        I honestly do not understand why the Shia think of Khomeini as an Islamic leader? What has he done for Islam? Khomeini has done nothing for Islam.

        Look at the website link provided about his origins. Be logical for a minute when you read.

        If Shia is the TRUTH, then why is it that every IRANIAN SHIA the moment they arrive in America or Germany or France they declare OPENLY and call themselves either a Christian, Jew or an Atheist? EVER WONDER WHY? YOU AS a person of intellect ever WONDER WHY? How can a sane person leave his religion if it is the TRUTH? How can a sane person then therefore leave Christianity if they are the truth? How can sane person leave Hinduism if they are the truth? OF COURSE you take your time to educate yourself you end up finding the TRUTH about it and the more you find the truth about them, the more you are going to hate it.

        Abdullah ibn Saba, did you guys all forgot about him? The Khawarij during the time of Ali radi Allahu an and those who killed him, did you all of a sudden forgot about that?

      2. zaheerhusainZAHEERHUSAINKHAN

        TRUTH IS ALWAYS BITTER . HATRED IS SHOWN IN WAHABI DOMINATED PAKISTAN , , SAUDI-YAHOODI INFESTED BAHARAIN, AND THE SAME TAKFEERI INVADED SYRIA
        SUUNISM , THE MOAVIAN CULT DOMINATE THE ISLAMIC WORLD THAT IS WHY THERE IS TROUBLE EVERY WHERE .

      3. Zaheerhusain Khan

        IT IS NOT A LANGUAGE OF HATRED , IT IS THE LANGUAGE OF TRUTH , IT IS THE LANGUAGE OF ASL- ISLAM , WHEN YOU MISGUIDED , INNOVATOR’S FOLLOWERS
        DO NOT HAVE ANY THING TO REPLY , THEN YOU USE SUCH LANGUAGE , WHERE
        IS THE HATE AND WHY DON’T YOU REPLY POINT FOR POINT FOR YOU HAVE NO
        ANSWER . YOU SLANDER THE NOBLEST OF ULMA E DEEN E ISLAM , ALMOST TOUCHING THE FEET OF INFALLIBLE AHLEBAYT , WHO DID SO MUCH FOR THE UNITY MABAIN
        MUSLEMEEN AND YOUR PEOPLE DARE SLANDER HIM FOR THEY SHIAS AND THEY HATE SHIA IRAN, LA’ANAT ON YOUR DEVIATED CULT . CAN YOU NAME A SINGLE PERSON OF THE CENTURY IN YOUR ULEMAH WHO CAN COME EVEN NEAR IN ILM,TAQWAH & PERHEZGARI WHICH SHOOK THE FOUNDATIONS OF MIGHTY NATIONS .

    3. luckylarrysilverstein

      THE JEWISH RABBI WHO CREATED ISLAM
      Rabbi Shallum, son of the then Resh Gelutha, in Babel, aka Abu Bachr al Chaliva al Zadik,

      Abu Bakr, the first Caliph, was in fact:
      [A JEWISH RABBI]

      Rabbi Shallum, son of the then Resh Gelutha, in Babel, perceiving this dreadful predicament, went to Mahomed, and offering him his submission, friendship, and services, endeavoured to enter with him into a friendly compact. Mahomed accepted his proposition with pleasure, conceived a great affection for him, and took his daughter, a handsome young girl (A 6 YEAR OLD CHILD), for wife; he made him also a general in his army, and gave him the name of Abu Bachr al Chaliva al Zadik, literally:

      The father of the maiden, the descendant of the righteous; this means, that of all his wives, who were either widows or divorced women, this one was the only one who had never been married before, and then she was the granddaughter of the celebrated chief of the captivity; therefore, the descendant of the righteous. This occurrence induced Mahomed to give up his terrible intention to destroy the Jews in his country, and thus did Rabbi Shallum save his people.

      THE BETRAYAL

      [Why Muhammad hated alcohol]

      Abu Bachr and Aliman now resolved among themselves to remove the dangerous enemy of the Jews, Bucheran. One evening Mahomed, Bucheran, Aliman, and Abu Bachr, were drinking together; the latter two soon saw that Mahomed and the astrologer were strongly intoxicated, and lay stretched out in a deep and profound sleep. Abu Bachr thereupon drew the sword of Mahomed from its scabbard, cut off therewith Bucharan’s head, and put the bloody sword back into its receptacle, and both then lay themselves down quietly near Mahomed to sleep. When Mahomed awoke and saw his friend lying decapitated near him, he cried out in a fury: “This terrible deed has been done by one of us three in our drunkenness!” Abu Bachr thereupon said quite unconcernedly: “Let each one draw his sword, and he whose weapon is stained with blood, must needs be the murderer!” They all drew their swords, and that of Mahomed was completely dyed with fresh blood, which proved thus clearly to his satisfaction that he had murdered his friend. He was greatly grieved at this discovery; cursed and condemned the wine which was the cause of this murder, and swore that he never would drink any more, and that also no one should do so who wishes to enter heaven. This is the cause why wine is prohibited to the Mahomedans.

      At a later period, Mahomed learned the whole transaction, and that his father-in-law was the perpetrator of the bloody deed; wherefore, he lost his favour, and he would not permit him to come before him. Abu Bachr went thereupon and conquered sixty places, which had not yet submitted to Mahomed, and presented them to him, through which means he became again reconciled to him, was received in favour, and remained thereafter at court.

      HISTORY OF PALESTINE
      614-1096 C.E.
      From the Accession of the Mahomedans to that of the Europeans.

      By Rabbi Joseph Schwarz, 1850

      BE SURE TO GOOGLE THE FULL ARTICLE!

      Reply
    4. saqib khan

      your such stupid person,

      i have not studied this book, but i have plan to do so.lets assume acording to you he is satan. do hou know what mualana ishaq (ahle hadith ) says about him? go search for it you will find.if he had been such satan allah would not have given him coruge to fight for anti muslim. or ager tu ullu k pathy satan nahi hai tu khara ho k lar muslmano k lia. history parhn ja k imamat tmhare galy ki haddi bni hoi hai.quran pe tmko larna nahi ata. her kisi pe kufar k fatway lagty ho. jahil nasbi tmhara thikana jahanum hi hai.or imam khumini satan haen ya jannati iska jawab tery muhn pe mara jaye inshlaha qayamt k din.

      mery pass teri bkwas k ilmli jawab bhi haen. but hou dont deserve to know.

      Reply
  1. hassanaskari1

    Awesome work brother for exposing this kafir khumeni the lier who decieved the Muslims in the name shiasunni unity , now he is exposed what a lier and kazzab he was. khumeni lanatullahialai

    Reply
  2. Soldier of Sahaba

    KHOMEINI AGAINST SAHABA AND BELOVED WIFE OF MUHAMMAD (PEACE BE UPON HIM)

    KHOMEINI SAYS IN HIS BOOK: KITABU DHAHARA VOL 3 PAGE 457.

    Quote:”AISHA, AZ-ZUBAIR, DHALHA, ARE WORSE THAN THE DOGS AND PIGS !. Unquote.

    Reply
  3. Soldier of Sahaba

    Here is what nonsense Khomeini wrote in his book :

    A man can have a sexual pleasure with a child as young as a baby. However he should not penetrate in the front private part, but the back is acceptable. If a man does penetrate in the front and damage the child then, he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. (Book: TahrerolVasyleh, fourth edition, Qom, Iran, 1990)

    Reply
  4. Cabdul Wahaab

    JazakAllahu Khayran.

    Khomeini was a cancer to earth.

    He got what he deserved in his funeral
    when the people that loved him misstakly took his sheets off,
    then stempin on him unaware.

    And now InshaAllah he is burning in an eternal fire.

    Reply
  5. Mubashir Hussain

    khumeni was a shaitan and still many khumenies present in many countries,,.they are not just a kaafir but worst kaafir of the world.he had gone to hell and his followers

    Reply
  6. Muhammad Sani

    i dont think d man-Khomeini was really “wrong” afterall he was propagating his religion called Rafidhi/Shi’sm (a religion based on fables and stories/satitires against islam). The actual problem started when one assumes/accepts them the shites as part of Islam.

    Reply
  7. Sabeeha Baig

    Astaghfirullah I was trembling while reading I’m sure khomeni is in hell and his followers will also b there with him soon

    Reply
    1. River Sand

      In sha Allah.
      How can be a Muslim and a Kafir in Heaven together. No way

      One will be in Heaven We Are Shia’s.
      so i know there will be no Disbeliever in Heave so am sure we will be in sha Allah.

      Reply
  8. Shaheed

    May Allaah increase the punishments of d grave of Khumeini

    May he neva perceive d odor of jannah
    Amiin thumma Amiin

    Reply
    1. zaheerhusain

      باطل سے برات کا سبق دے گیا ہم کو

      افکار کے تابندہ اُفق دے گیا ہم کو
      اذہان کی گلرنگ شفق دے گیا ہم کو

      اسلام کی عظمت کے بتا کر ہمیں اسرار
      باطل سے برات کا سبق دے گیا ہم کو

      اس دین کی اقدار کو آئین بنا کر
      فردوس میں جانے کا ورق دے گیا ہم کو

      پینے سے نظر آتی ہے جنت کی گذرگاہ
      اس چشمۂ حیواں کا عرق دے گیا ہم کو

      ہے ذائقہ ایسا کہ لبوں پر من وسلویٰ
      روحانی غذاؤں کا طبق دے گیا ہم کو

      مسدود ہوئی جاتی تھیں اسلام کی راہیں
      تابندہ شریعت کا سبق دے گیا ہم کو

      THAT WAS THE AYATOLLAH THE GREAT ,
      BURN YOU INFIDELS IN ENVY WITH YOUR TRIPLE IDIOTS .

      Reply
  9. zaheerhusain

    Burn in hatred you all khabees worshippers of the three Idiots who were shaitaan in the garb of
    munafeqeen . Their Kufr is obvious by the fact that they ran away from the Ghazwas leaving their Leader seriously injured almost dying . Qora’an e kareem specific verse declares such deserters as apostate , unbeleiver and Jahannumi .
    It is indeed the reverend Ayatollah marhoom wa maghfoor’s magnanimity that despite knowing well that no praise of any kind they deserve , the grand Ayatollah made it mandatory on their followers not to speak ill about these figures in public , which does not mean don’t speak, tell or write history and truth.about whom Sunnis are grossly misguided to consider them of any merit on earth .I don’t blame them for what the learnd from their parents, maoulvis and grossly fabri-cated books recorded 200 years later after Mohammad (saaws)
    What do YOU say to your own Mother of beleiver who as per your own narrations , declared the third as NATHAL and Wajibul Qatl . And see your own foolishness that the greatest EVIL of his Time , your Moaviah Maloun , whose son of the same nature as his father and who inhallated the whole family and friends of the Farzand e Rasool (saaws) , you dare to suffix their name with R A A while he brutally killed her and her brother , the son of your fake Khalifah No. 1.
    Razi Allah , though they deserve only La’anat Allah Anho .
    Really you have no shame what to say any aqeedah of real Islaam though through freak of fate accupy the greater part of this filthy world and adminsteer the holiest of the holy place , the Harmain — Shareefain..

    Reply
    1. Micheal

      where were shia when Hussain & his family were being killed in the desert of karbala, after all they were in great majoriy there and they invited him to come by writing him one million letters. Any idea?

      Reply
    2. Adel

      Zaheerhusein….Your Shia no-religion doesn’t make any sense. it’s all based on fantasies and misinterpretations of the Koran, of Hadiths, and of facts, and mountains of lies on top of them. If Abu-Bakr, Umar, and Uthman were cowards, escaped from and avoided battles, then why the hell did the Prophet Muhammad (Peace on Him) still kept them as Sahaba ???? Why didn’t he punish them ?? Why didn’t he at least throw them out from his followers ??? Why would the Prophet (peace on him) give TWO of his daughters for marriage to such a “coward” and “kafir” as Uthman (radhi Alla anhu) ???? Why ??? Was the Prophet (Peace on Him) so stupid ??? Do you really think so ??? Do you ??? Come on, man !!!! As you can see, the Shia is so totally illogical !!!! It doesn’t make any sense !!!!

      Reply
      1. zaheerhusain

        Punishment do not come from Rasool , Allah punishes & it has already started, they both are under fishaar e qabr because the place they are buried is not their fathers . Usurpers in life, usurper after death .
        DEAD TRESSPASSERS

  10. abe parker

    wow!! you guys really are fakes, the quran castigated harshly many sahaba who opposed the prophet sawa on many occasions, is and was the author of the quran wrong? nauthubillah!! then there are many sunni hadith where one sahabi calls the other liar regarding narrating hadith in the name of the prophet sawa, then tens of thousands sahaba killed each other, are the killer and killed both in jannah? are they all absolved of being killers? then you have sunni hadith which says maaaany sahaba go to jahanam because they deviated after prophet sawa, since you cant call prophet sawa anything bad why dont you call these narrators or collectors of hadith kaafir etc as you do above?

    Reply
  11. zaheerhusain

    Janab Parkar Sahab , Please don’t waste your time , these deviant worshippers of the evil shaikhains will never understand , their minds have been SEALD which will open up when after the judgement they will feel the heat and their fat will melt .
    They should have regarded the most respected Ayatollah Khomain i Rehmat Allah, their savior as there is no doubt that the reverend Ayotallah did lot of efforts in bringing the two warring sects togather , but these meanest sunnies because of their filthy lineage will never see reason . Indeed they are the fuel of Jahannum .

    Reply
  12. Koala

    I am sunni but I cannot understand the amount of hatred towards shia and imam Khomeini by some sunnis subhanallah. Early days of Islam were difficult times and there are indeed several interpretations of some events and we should be able to allow everybody to express their opinion. Sahaba, as much as we love them, were not saints or sinless. There are no saints in Islam. There are things that we know they erred and made serious mistakes.
    If you point out to these excerpts from imam Khomeini’s book and call him sheythan or disbeliever then what should one say about sunnis looking at Osama bin Laden or the state of the faith in Saudi Arabia for example? Please be more tolerant. We are all muslims.

    Reply
    1. zaheerhusain

      ABU HORAIRAH KAZZAB FABRICATED A LOT OF SO CALLED AHADEES , SOME OF THEM AS VALGUR AS PORN AND ALONG WITH HIM A SCORE OF OTHERS IN COLLISION WITH SON OF ABU SOFIYAN (L A) MOAVIAH MALOUN FOUNDED A CULT WHICH IN FACT WAS A VERY UGLY CARICATURE OF ISLAM , AND THEY NAMED IT AHLE SUNNAH WAL JAMA’A . HE WAS APPOINTED GOVERNOR BY THE SON OF AN ILLEGITIMATE USURPER RULER WHOSE LINEAGE HAS BEEN VERY EXPLICTLY DESCRIBED BY A SUNNI WRITER IN HIS BOOK AL SALABATA FI MAREFATAH AL SAHABAH BY MOHAMMAD AL SAEB AL KALBI ABOUT THE MOST FILTHY LINEAGE AND THE PACK OF MUNAFEQEEN MADE HIMM NOT ONLY THE 2ND RULER BUT ALSO A HOPEFULL WHO COULD HAVE BEEN A PROPHET IF THERE WAS ONE AFTER THE KHATIM UL NABOOWAT (SAAWS) .AYATOLLAH KHOMAINI REHMATALLAH WAS TOO NOBLE , TOO KIND THAT HE PERCIEVED AN IDEA THAT THERE CAN BE A UNITY BETWEEN THE SHAITAAN CULT AHLE SUNNAH WITH THE DEEN OF REAL ISLAM OF AHLEBAYT E RASOOL (S).. CAN ANY BODY THINK A UNITY AND DOSTI BETWEEN SUNNI IBLEES AND SHIA JIBRAEIL .YOU ARE RIGHT ABOUT MOST SAHABAH WHEN YOU SAY THEY WERE NOT SAINTS OR SINLESS , BUT IF YOU HAD ANY KNOWLEDGE OF QORA’AN , YOU WOULD HAVE KNOWN WHAT ALLAH PROCLAIMED ABOUT THE AHLEBAYT E RASOOL (S) IN THE AYA E TATHEER Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 17:14:43 +0000 To: zaheerhusain@hotmail.com

      Reply
  13. Zaheerhusain Khan

    ABU HORAIRAH KAZZAB FABRICATED A LOT OF SO CALLED AHADEES , SOME OF THEM AS VALGUR AS PORN AND ALONG WITH HIM A SCORE OF OTHERS IN COLLISION WITH SON OF ABU SOFIYAN (L A) MOAVIAH MALOUN FOUNDED A CULT WHICH IN FACT WAS A VERY UGLY CARICATURE OF ISLAM , AND THEY NAMED IT AHLE SUNNAH WAL JAMA’A . HE WAS APPOINTED GOVERNOR BY THE SON OF AN ILLEGITIMATE USURPER RULER WHOSE LINEAGE HAS BEEN VERY EXPLICTLY DESCRIBED BY A SUNNI WRITER IN HIS BOOK AL SALABATA FI MAREFATAH AL SAHABAH BY MOHAMMAD AL SAEB AL KALBI ABOUT THE MOST FILTHY LINEAGE AND THE PACK OF MUNAFEQEEN MADE HIMM NOT ONLY THE 2ND RULER BUT ALSO A HOPEFULL WHO COULD HAVE BEEN A PROPHET IF THERE WAS ONE AFTER THE KHATIM UL NABOOWAT (SAAWS) .
    AYATOLLAH KHOMAINI REHMATALLAH WAS TOO NOBLE , TOO KIND THAT HE PERCIEVED AN IDEA THAT THERE CAN BE A UNITY BETWEEN THE SHAITAAN CULT AHLE SUNNAH WITH THE DEEN OF REAL ISLAM OF AHLEBAYT E RASOOL (S).. CAN ANY BODY THINK A UNITY AND DOSTI BETWEEN SUNNI IBLEES AND SHIA JIBRAEIL .
    YOU ARE RIGHT ABOUT MOST SAHABAH WHEN YOU SAY THEY WERE NOT SAINTS OR SINLESS , BUT IF YOU HAD ANY KNOWLEDGE OF QORA’AN , YOU WOULD HAVE KNOWN WHAT ALLAH PROCLAIMED ABOUT THE AHLEBAYT E RASOOL (S) IN THE AYA E TATHEER .

    Reply
  14. Zaheerhusain Khan

    IT IS NOT A LANGUAGE OF HATRED , IT IS THE LANGUAGE OF TRUTH , IT IS THE LANGUAGE OF ASL- ISLAM , WHEN YOU MISGUIDED , INNOVATOR’S FOLLOWERS
    DO NOT HAVE ANY THING TO REPLY , THEN YOU USE SUCH LANGUAGE , WHERE
    IS THE HATE AND WHY DON’T YOU REPLY POINT FOR POINT FOR YOU HAVE NO
    ANSWER . YOU SLANDER THE NOBLEST OF ULMA E DEEN E ISLAM , ALMOST TOUCHING THE FEET OF INFALLIBLE AHLEBAYT , WHO DID SO MUCH FOR THE UNITY MABAIN
    MUSLEMEEN AND YOUR PEOPLE DARE SLANDER HIM FOR THEY SHIAS AND THEY HATE SHIA IRAN, LA’ANAT ON YOUR DEVIATED CULT . CAN YOU NAME A SINGLE PERSON OF THE CENTURY IN YOUR ULEMAH WHO CAN COME EVEN NEAR IN ILM,TAQWAH & PERHEZGARI WHICH SHOOK THE FOUNDATIONS OF MIGHTY NATIONS .

    Reply
  15. sui 123

    Satanist Shias!!!Don’t lie and talk crap…Subhannalah I saw the crap you too were posting….Arent you ashamed of being Shia?Your entire Muttah Cult is based in lies and Fables…If we listen to the rubbish you Shia believe that means Ali RA and Hussain RA were cowards and liars..they use to make taqiyyah…they were promiscuous and use to sleep around…your filthy cult sais that’s the Sunnah of Ali RA!May Allah punish you deviant fire worshipers…Your 1st Imam is Abdullah Ibn Saba

    Reply
    1. zaheerhusain

      ALL THOSE WHO CALL THE GREATEST & NOBLEST PERSON ON THE GLOBE IN RECENT YEARS , AYATOLLAH KHOMAINI r a a , BUT SUUNIS WERE NOT SUCH RABIDS TILL SOME DECADES BACK . MANY OF THEM HAD LOVE FOR AHLEBAYT (a) AND PARTICIPATED IN THE MOURNINGS OF THE RASOOL’S PROGENY PARTICULARLY IMAM HUSAIN (a s).
      THE RISE OF THE WAHABI SALAFI HAPPENED ONLY LESS THAN A CENTURY BACK . NEJDI MONEY AND THE LURE OF CRIME & TERRORISM IS DECAYING THEM .
      EVEN THE GREAT EFFORTS THE AYATOLLAH REALLY DID IS NOT APPRECIATED BY THEM NOW. IT IS UNIMAGINABLE HE EVER SAID ANY THING OBJECTIONABLE AGAINST THE PROPHET (s) , HOWEVER HOW COULD HE HAVE IGNORED THE CRIMES OF USURPING, TERRORISM AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACIES OF THE KHOLAFA E SALASAH ON WHICH THE ATTEMPT WAS TO KEEP IT UNDER WRAPS HIDDEN UNDER A BIG VEIL, HOWEVER THE FREE PRESS , ACCESS TO INFO THROUGH EASEIR PRINT MEDIA , INTERNET , FILM AND VIDEO HAS EXPOSED THEIR CHARACTERS NAKED , SO THE SUNNAH WAL JAMA’A HAVE NO ALTERNATIVE LEFT , BUT TO RESORT TO ABUSE THE SHIAS AND REFUSE EVERY TRUTH .
      JUST TELL ME WHAT BAD TRAITS WERE NOT THERE IN ONE OF THEM OR THE OTHER . THOROUGH LIES , RUFFIANISM , GOONDAISM, BAD MANNERS , EMBEZZLEMENTS, CONS-PIRACIES , MURDERS & TERRORISM , YOU ASK FOR A VICE AND THEY HAD IT . THOUGH
      THEY ARE SAID TO BE VERY CLOSE TO THE RASOOL(s) BUT DID NOT PICKED UP ANY GOOD , REBELLED THE MOMENT THE PROPHET OF ISLAM CLOSED HIS EYES & TURNED APOSTATE . EVEN DURING HIS LIFE TIME THEY APPOSED ON CERTAIN MATTERS, ABUSED AND IGNORED HIS (s) ORDERS . SO WHAT IF THE REVEREND AYATOLLAH HIGHLIGHTED
      THEIR CRIMES HOWEVER IT CANNOT BE DENIED THAT HE SINCERELY MADE EFFORTS TO BRING DOWN RECONCILLIATION BETWEEN THE 2 MAJOR SECTS OF ISLAM .

      Reply
  16. Moe Lats

    KHOMEINI IS A SATANIST…SHIASM IS THE RELIGION OF SATINSM…THEY CAN HAVE SEX WITH RANDOM WOMAN…THEY SAY ZINNAH IS FOR ALLAHS PLEASURE…THEY CUT THEMSELVES…THEY LIE…THEY KILL MUSLIMS…THEY SAY NABI SAW.IS A FAILURE…IN MY COUNTRY SHIA KILL MUSLIM WHO NAME AFTER SAHABA…SHIAS ARE SATANISM

    Reply
    1. zaheerhusain

      AYOTALLAH KHOMAINI (a r ) WAS THE MOST NOBLE PERSON BORN IN THIS ERA . BADI MUSHKIL SAY HOTA HAI JAHAN MAIN DEEDAWAR PAIDAH .
      SHIA IS ONLY AN IDENTITY , SHIA MEANS FOLLOWERS OF ALI IBNE ABI TALIB (a) . AFTER THE DEMISE OF RASOOL E AKRAM (s) MOST SAHABAS REBELLED , TURNED THEIR HEELS INNOVATED AND AMMENDED ISLAM TO CONSOLIDATE THEIR ILLEGITIMATE , ILLEGAL RULE , APPOINTED MOAVIAH WHO FOUNDED A CULT ,CARICATURE OF ISLAM . THIS WAS CALLED AHLE SUNNAH WAL JAMA’A .
      THERE IS A MINORITY WHO ADHERED TO REAL ISLAM THEY ARE THE REAL ISLAM . NO ONE IS PERFECT EXCEPT THE AAL E MOHAMMAD (s) WHO ARE IMMACULATE AND INFALLIBLE .SHIAS TRY TO FOLLOW THEIR DICTATES , THEY ARE GUIDED BY THEM .

      SUNNAH FOLLOWSTHE DEVIATED , MISGUIDED SAHABAS GONE APPOSTATE , MANY WERE SO WEAK IN EIMAN THAT AT THE LEAST DANGERS TO THEIR SELF THEY FLEE GHAZWAS , AS PER QORA’AN THEY BECAME UNBELIEVERS , JAHANNUMIS , SUNNIES ARE THEIR FOLLOWERS , RATHER WORSHIP THEM , THUS THERE IS THE BIG DIVIDE OF ASL-ISLAM AND AHLE SUNN AH , KASSERAH (MAJORITY) IS ALWAYS ASTRAY , NOT ME , IT IS QORA’AN SAYS, BUT HOW WOULD YOU POOR SUNNIS KNOW , FOR YOU IT IS ONLY TO ROTE AND CRAM BECOME A HAFIZ MULLAH JEE DONT EVEN PERFORM THE WAZO SO CLEARLY GIVEN IN SURA E MAEDAH . CAN YOU EVER REFLECT OR ONCE THE BUZURGS (elders) COMMITTED A MISTAKE IT WILL CONTINUE TILL QAYAMAH .OK GO ON WASHING LEGS AGAINST MASAH , WHAT HAPPENS TO YOUR NAMAAZ ALLAH KNOWS , HE WILL GIVE THE AJR OF ”YOGA”.

      Reply
      1. SardarKhan

        If Shias are not Accepting ABU BAKAR,USMAN,UMAR R.a if you think that they were not On right path (Nauzubillah) Then why did Hazrat Hussain R.a Named there two Sons ABU BAKAR and USMAN…..You are Blooody kafirs I wish i could kill all Shias

      2. The person.

        your books say Allah makes mistakes
        Khomeini is a friend of iblis and a dajjal
        Your shaytan friend Khomeini raped a 4 year old girl
        Freaking 4 FOUR
        Your temporarily marriages are haram
        You commit zina
        You murder
        Beat yourself to a bloody pulp but inshallah you will get worse in this world the grave and next
        Allah says in the quran he loves Abu bakr as siddiq r.a the all of the sahaba
        Any sane person knows your f’cking retarted by you always using caps SHIT es are worse then how they sound

      3. Eng. ISMAEEL Marikar

        THAT IS PERHAPS WHY HE WENT TO HIS GRAVE ALMOST NAKED. HE WAS STRIPPED OF HIS SHROUD BY ALL HIS ADMIRERS. TO HELL WITH HIM .ZAHEER HUSSAIN WHO THE HELL ARE YOU TO CURSE THE BEST OF THIS UMMAH. IT IS ALL ABOUT SUCCESSION. WELL WHY THE HECK DID ALI NOT OBJECT AND PLEDGED ALLEGIANCE TO ABU BAKR ,UMAR AND UTHMAN.REMEMBER IT IS ALLAH WHO GIVES RULERSHIP. . YOU DAMN SHIAS HAVE NOTHING TO STAND ON. THE FIRE IS WAITING FOR YOU.

    2. zaheerhusain khan

      AYOTALLAH KHOMAINI (a r ) WAS THE MOST NOBLE PERSON BORN IN THIS ERA . BADI MUSHKIL SAY HOTA HAI JAHAN MAIN DEEDAWAR PAIDAH . SHIA IS ONLY AN IDENTITY , SHIA MEANS FOLLOWERS OF ALI IBNE ABI TALIB (a) . AFTER THE DEMISE OF RASOOL E AKRAM (s) MOST SAHABAS REBELLED , TURNED THEIR HEELS  INNOVATED AND AMMENDED ISLAM TO CONSOLIDATE THEIR ILLEGITIMATE , ILLEGAL RULE , APPOINTED MOAVIAH WHO FOUNDED A CULT ,CARICATURE OF ISLAM . THIS WAS CALLED AHLE SUNNAH WAL JAMA’A . THERE IS A MINORITY WHO ADHERED TO REAL ISLAM   THEY ARE THE REAL ISLAM . NO ONE IS PERFECT EXCEPT THE AAL E MOHAMMAD (s) WHO ARE IMMACULATE AND INFALLIBLE .SHIAS TRY TO FOLLOW THEIR DICTATES , THEY ARE GUIDED BY THEM .

      SUNNAH FOLLOWSTHE DEVIATED , MISGUIDED SAHABAS GONE APPOSTATE , MANY WERE  SO WEAK IN EIMAN THAT AT THE LEAST DANGERS TO THEIR SELF THEY FLEE GHAZWAS , AS PER QORA’AN THEY BECAME UNBELIEVERS , JAHANNUMIS , SUNNIES ARE THEIR FOLLOWERS , RATHER  WORSHIP THEM , THUS THERE IS THE BIG DIVIDE OF ASL-ISLAM AND AHLE SUNN AH , KASSERAH (MAJORITY) IS ALWAYS ASTRAY , NOT ME , IT IS QORA’AN SAYS, BUT HOW WOULD YOU POOR SUNNIS KNOW , FOR YOU IT IS ONLY TO ROTE AND CRAM BECOME A HAFIZ MULLAH JEE DONT EVEN PERFORM THE WAZO SO CLEARLY GIVEN IN SURA E MAEDAH . CAN YOU EVER REFLECT OR ONCE THE BUZURGS (elders) COMMITTED A MISTAKE IT WILL CONTINUE TILL QAYAMAH .OK GO ON WASHING LEGS AGAINST MASAH , WHAT HAPPENS TO YOUR NAMAAZ  ALLAH KNOWS , HE WILL GIVE THE AJR OF ”YOGA”.

      Reply
  17. Micheal

    I have yet to understand that ,when Hussain was hungry , thirsty , having nothing to eat , not for him , nor for his family, the shia instead of fasting , they make hundereds of different kind of food items everyday during Muharam and eat it in mixed gatherings , laughs and jokes . They beat themselves till the day Hussain was alive,i.e 10th of muharam. On the 10th day ,when Hussain and his family were killed , rather mourning, shia will pack up and leave for their homes. Its the day , they should start mourning Hussain & family massacre by the ex-governor to Ali and by his step brother but souns like they were happy by killing Hussain and family
    .

    Reply
    1. Adel

      Michael….this is only one more of the countless inconsistencies and contradictions that permeate the Shia belief !!!! You hit on the right point !!! Really.

      Reply
      1. zaheerhusain khan

        ADEL AND MICHEL . WHEN YOUR FATHER, YOUR MOTHER YOUR SISTER YOUR SON OR DAUGHTER DIES , MAY BE FOR FEW HOURS YOU DON’T EAT OR DRINK ANYTHING , WILL YOU NEVER EAT A SWEET OR ANY THING SPEC IAL . MOHIBBAN E HUSAIN (a s )DO NOT PARTAKE ANYTHING FROM THE EVENING OF NITH MOHARRAM, THE WHOLE NIGHT THEY SPEND IN IBADAAT , THEN ATTEND JULOOS, MAJALIS AND PRAY THE AAMAAL E ROZE AASHOORAH , RECITE ZIARAAT AND ONLY AT ASR THEY HAVE A NAZR ON WATER OR SHARBAT AND EAT SIMPLEST FOOD ONLY TO FILL .. TRADITIONALY THIS IS BOILED RICE AND MASOOR DAAL THE SIMPLEST FOOD TO WARD OFF HUNGER .. NO DOUBT TO FEED MOURNERS THROUGHOUT MOHARRAM AND REAST OF THE MOURNING DAYS TABARRUK IS DISTRIBUTED AFTER EVERY AZA E HUSAIN (a s ). THERE IS A HADEES THAT ALLAH INFORMED THE RASOOL (s) OF THIS TRAGEDY IN ADVANCE AND THE RASOOL E KAREEM WEPT . WHEN THE DAUGHTER ASKED , HE TOLD THE TRAGIC EVENTS WHICH WILL BEFALL THE FAMILY . SHE WEPT AND ASKED. WHO THEN WILL CRY AND MOURN THE MARTYRDOM .RASOOL (s)SAID FROM MY UMMAH A GROUP WILL EMERGE WHO WILL WEEP & MOURN . SO WHAT SHIAS DO IS A SUNNAH, THEY LOVE RASOOL(S) THEY LOVE HIS PROGENY, THEY CELEBRATE THEIR BIRTHDAYS, WEDDING DAYS AND FEED RELATIONS , POORS, ORPHANS . PEOPLETHINK AS A SUNNAH THE MORE THEY SPEND THE MORE REWARDS ARE EXPECTED . IS THERE ANY THING SERIOUSLY WRONG OR THE PROBLEM IS IN THE KAFFIRANA BRAIN OF THOSE WHO THINK THEY ARE MUSLIMS , MERRY MAKING , GOING TO CINEMA HALL ON THE DAY THE NAWASAH E RASOOL (a s ) ATTAINED MARTYRDOM ALONG WITH HIS KITH & KIN WITH A SIX MONTH OLD . THOSE WHO DO NOT APPROVE THIS HAVE NO CLAIM ON ISLAM .

      2. zaheerhusain khan

        ADEL AND MICHEL . WHEN YOUR FATHER, YOUR MOTHER YOUR SISTER YOUR SON OR DAUGHTER DIES , MAY BE FOR FEW HOURS YOU DON’T EAT OR DRINK ANYTHING , WILL YOU NEVER EAT A SWEET OR ANY THING SPEC IAL . MOHIBBAN E HUSAIN (a s )DO NOT PARTAKE ANYTHING FROM THE EVENING OF NITH MOHARRAM, THE WHOLE NIGHT THEY SPEND IN IBADAAT , THEN ATTEND JULOOS, MAJALIS AND PRAY THE AAMAAL E ROZE AASHOORAH , RECITE ZIARAAT AND ONLY AT ASR THEY HAVE A NAZR ON WATER OR SHARBAT AND EAT SIMPLEST FOOD ONLY TO FILL .. TRADITIONALY THIS IS BOILED RICE AND MASOOR DAAL THE SIMPLEST FOOD TO WARD OFF HUNGER .. NO DOUBT TO FEED MOURNERS THROUGHOUT MOHARRAM AND REST OF THE MOURNING DAYS TABARRUK IS DISTRIBUTED AFTER EVERY AZA E HUSAIN (a s ). THERE IS A HADEES THAT ALLAH INFORMED THE RASOOL (s) OF THIS TRAGEDY IN ADVANCE AND THE RASOOL E KAREEM WEPT . WHEN THE DAUGHTER ASKED , HE TOLD THE TRAGIC EVENTS WHICH WILL BEFALL THE FAMILY . SHE WEPT AND ASKED. WHO THEN WILL CRY AND MOURN THE MARTYRDOM .RASOOL (s)SAID FROM MY UMMAH A GROUP WILL EMERGE WHO WILL WEEP & MOURN . SO WHAT SHIAS DO IS A SUNNAH, THEY LOVE RASOOL(S) THEY LOVE HIS PROGENY, THEY CELEBRATE THEIR BIRTHDAYS, WEDDING DAYS AND FEED RELATIONS , POORS, ORPHANS . PEOPLETHINK AS A SUNNAH THE MORE THEY SPEND THE MORE REWARDS ARE EXPECTED . IS THERE ANY THING SERIOUSLY WRONG OR THE PROBLEM IS IN THE KAFFIRANA BRAIN OF THOSE WHO THINK THEY ARE MUSLIMS , MERRY MAKING , GOING TO CINEMA HALL ON THE DAY THE NAWASAH E RASOOL (a s ) ATTAINED MARTYRDOM ALONG WITH HIS KITH & KIN WITH A SIX MONTH OLD . THOSE WHO DO NOT APPROVE THIS HAVE NO CLAIM ON ISLAM .

    2. Nazim

      Michael,

      The real purpose behind the mouring and beating themselves is because the Shias live in guilt. The guilt is that they murdered the Prophet’s grandson.

      Reply
  18. zaheerhusain

    THE THREE SAHABAH ARE CURSED BECAUSE THEY SCHEMED , POISONED THE PROPHET OF ISLAM(saaws), CONFISCATED THE RIGHTFUL KHILAFAH OF HIS COUSIN AND DECLARED SUCCESSOR,CONFISCATED HIS PROPERTY GIFTED TO HIS ONLY DAUGHTER, MADE A TERRORIST ATTACK ON THE DOOR OF FATEMA (s) ON WHICH DOOR IT WAS THE ROUTINE OF PROPHET TO COME IN THE MORNING AND BLESS ALL HIS DAUGHTER’S FAMILY.
    IF SUCH CRIMINALS, BAD CHARACTERS , FLEERS OF GHAZWAS LEAVING THE RASOOL ALONE & ALMOST DYING , IF MUSLIMS DO NOT CURSE , SEND ALLAH’S LA’ANAT ON, WHAT THEY SHOULD DO ? ,EULOGIZE THEM OR PRAY FOR THEIR PARDON . EVEN JANAB SAIYEDDAH SAID ” I SHALL NOT DOA FOR YOU & SHALL COMPLAIN ABOUT YOU 2 WHEN I MEET ”. SHE HAD TO SAY ” IF SUCH CALAMITY WAS FALLEN DUE TO THEM AS ON DAY , IT WOULD HAVE TURNED TO NIGHT. THIS IS A FIGURE OF SPEECH FOR UNTOLD ZULM ON HER , AND ON WHOM , THE ONLY DAUGHTER OF THE RASOOL (s) WHICH
    DID RESULTED IN HER UNTIMELY DEATH .THESE ZALEMEEN
    ARE NOT LIABLE TO BE CURSED .

    Reply
  19. Adel

    Shia beliefs always go against logic and truth. Lies built upon lies and pile of lies until the Shia themselves have become prisoners of such lies. If the Prophet (PUH) was poisoned by the Sahaba and his wife Aisha, then why didn’t Ali bin Abi Talib punish them ? Why didn’t Ali punish the prophet’s wife Aisha for allegedly committing adultery ? Wasn’t he the Caliph in his times ? Why did he let her go ? Ali had all the powers and authority to implement the word of Allah !! If the Caliphs Abu Bakr, Omar, and Uthman had poisoned the Prophet and did many other bad things, why didn’t Ali remove them from their graves close to the Prophet’s ? Isn’t in Shia believes that the Mahdi at the End of Times will himself remove the corpses of Aby Bakr and Omar from their graves, hang them on a tree, and then lash at them with a whip ? Why wait for the Mahdi at the end of times while Ali had all the divine authority to do it himself ? Why did Ali let Aisha go away with murder and have an easy time while he had all the divine powers to do it ? It means Ali went against Sharia !! Right ??
    The Shia also believe (among others) that the Mahdi will bring the true Koran at the End of Times, and that all current Korans will be lifted to the sky that day !! (Imagine ???!?!!?) Yet they also say that in his times, Ali knew the true Koran. He had it with him. The question, then, poses itself: Why didn’t Ali give us the true Koran ?? At least after he became Caliph. Wasn’t it better than waiting till the End of Times ?? What’s the use of the true Koran at the End of Times ?? Why not not at the “Beginning of Times” ?? Was Ali happy seeing Muslims fight each other because of a “fake” Koran ??
    Too many questions and many others arise due to the inconsistencies and baseless believes the of Shia follow !! It is an unbelievable and contradictory religion in ts own right !! It is not a religion altogether !!!

    Reply
    1. Adel

      if the three Sahaba poisoned, killed and betrayed the Prophet (Peace on Him) then a very serious question comes up: Where was Ali (Radhia Allah Anhu) ??????? Where was he from all this ??????? A simple watcher ???? A man afraid for his life ??? An accomplice ??? Where was he ???? Sitting and crying at home ???? Give me a break !!! These kind of false accusations are an insult to the Prophet (Peace on Him) himself and his mind, and to Ali (Radhia Allah Anhu) and all Muslims during that era !!!!!

      Reply
      1. Zaheerhusain Khan

        SHIAISM IS THE REAL ISLAM GUIDED BY AHLEBAYT (a) . IT IS THE MOST LOGICAL MAZHAB
        LIES ARE RIJS , THERE IS NO REACH OF LIES IN ISLAM GUIDED BY AHLEBAYT . SHEIKH YASIR HABIB OF KUWAIT HAVE PROVED BEYOND DOUT WITH SUNNI REFERENCES AND LOGICAL ARGUMENTS THAT THEY DID POISON AND IT IS EVIDENCED BY THE FACT THAT THE SAHABI REFUSED TO GO TO WAR UNDER OSAMA, ABSENTED THEMSELVES FROM BURIKAL AND ENACTED AN ABSURD DRAMA OF SELECTION WHEN ALLAH HAD ALREADY APPOINTED AND IT IS PROVED THAT THEY PAYED THEIR ALLEGIANCE AT GHADEER .
        DID THE PROPHET OF ISLAM PUNISHED ANY ONE THAT HIS IMMEDIATE SUCCESSOR WOULD HAVE DONE IT , HOWEVER BE SURE ALLAH WILL NEVER SPARE THE MUNAFEQOON, THE ZALEMOON THEY WILL BE PUNISHED AND THEIR FOLLOWERS/ ADMIRERS TOO AS SUCH YOU TOO .
        SAHABAS SUGGESTED , EVIL DAUGHTERS IMPLEMENTED, NO ONE WAS GUARDING 24 HOURS, NOT PHYSICALLY POISSIBLE . THERE ARE MENTIONS FORCING AS MEDICINES.

        THESE ARE FACTS, NOT FALSE ACCUSITIONS , REPLY TO THE POINTS BY POINTS ON
        THE VIDEO OF SHEIKH YASIR HABIB.
        WAIT FOR ALLAH’S JUDGEMENT , BE BEHIND THEM AND FOLLOW WHERE THEY ARE SENT .FACTS ARE FACTS , CAN’T BE HIDDEN BEHIND PLEA THESE ARE ACCUSATIONS.

        AS PER NUMEROUS AUTHENTIC AHADEES BY SUNNIES, WILL YOU DENY THAT ABU BAKR . SENT, UMAR WHO ATTACKED THE DOOR OF FATEMA (s) THERE WERE DOZEN THUGS WITH HIM AND BURNT THE DOOR CAUSING DEATH OF H FATEMA’S SON IN THE WOMB . WILL YOU DENY EVEN THIS AND IS IT AN ORDINARY CRIME , IF THEY HAD NOT DONE THAT WHY LATER THEY TRIED TO REPENT AND APOLOGISE, WHY ? DID SHE ACCEPTED THEIR APOLOGY ? NO: SHE TURNED HER FACE TOWARDS WALL. IN FACT SHE WAS NOT GRANTING AUDIANCE , THEY SOUGHT ALI’S HELP. SHE RELUCTANTLY AGREED TO MEET ON HUSBAND’S RECOMMENDATION . SHE SAID , ” I SHALL NEVER DO DOA FOR YOU TWO AND SHALL COMPLAIN WHEN MEET MY FATHER,THE PROPHET OF ISLAM . LET THE QAYAMAT COME AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS , YOU SHALL BE WITH THEM IN YOUR HEREAFTER BEING FOLLOWERS . WHY SHOULD WE BOTHER WE ARE CONFIDENT OF ALLAH’S JUSTICE .

      2. zaheerhusain

        ON ORDERS FROM THEIR FATHERS, WHEN THE RASOOL WAS IN DEEP UNCONCIUOSNESS , THEY ADMINSTERED. POISON . A KUWAIT SHEIKH HAS PROVED THIS POINT IN A CONVINSING VIDEO . AGAIN AND AGAIN THE POISIONING BY THE KHYBERS JEWS WOMEN WAS MENTIONED . DOES A LETHAL POISON GIVES 3 YEARS REMISSION . THIS INDEED WAS GUILT CONCIOUSNESS . TWO EVIL DAUGHTERS OF TWO EVIL SAHABAS WERE IN A HURRY TO ASCENT THEIR FATHERS ON THE THRONE . GREED AND LUST ARE THE WORST ENEMY OF MAN .THE BUBLE OF THE ASHRA MUBASHRA WILL BURST IN QAYAMAH
        BUT THEN THERE WILL BE NO ROOM FOR REPENTENCE , THEY WILL BE AND THE FIRES
        OF HELL WILL BE THERE EMBRACING EACH OTHER . THEN AYATOLLAH KHOMAINI WILL SMILE FROM THE PARADISE ABOVE UNDERNEATH RIVERS WILL FLOW . . .

  20. Zaheerhusain Khan

    ADEL AND MICHEL .
    WHEN YOUR FATHER, YOUR MOTHER YOUR SISTER YOUR SON OR DAUGHTER DIES , MAY BE FOR FEW HOURS YOU DON’T EAT OR DRINK ANYTHING , WILL YOU NEVER EAT A SWEET OR ANY THING SPEC IAL .
    MOHIBBAN E HUSAIN (a s )DO NOT PARTAKE ANYTHING FROM THE EVENING OF NITH MOHARRAM, THE WHOLE NIGHT THEY SPEND IN IBADAAT , THEN ATTEND JULOOS, MAJALIS AND PRAY THE AAMAAL E ROZE AASHOORAH , RECITE ZIARAAT AND ONLY AT ASR THEY HAVE A NAZR ON WATER OR SHARBAT AND EAT SIMPLEST FOOD ONLY TO FILL .. TRADITIONALY THIS IS BOILED RICE AND MASOOR DAAL THE SIMPLEST FOOD TO WARD OFF HUNGER ..
    NO DOUBT TO FEED MOURNERS THROUGHOUT MOHARRAM AND REAST OF THE MOURNING DAYS TABARRUK IS DISTRIBUTED AFTER EVERY AZA E HUSAIN (a s ).
    THERE IS A HADEES THAT ALLAH INFORMED THE RASOOL (s) OF THIS TRAGEDY IN ADVANCE AND THE RASOOL E KAREEM WEPT . WHEN THE DAUGHTER ASKED , HE TOLD THE TRAGIC EVENTS WHICH WILL BEFALL THE FAMILY . SHE WEPT AND ASKED. WHO THEN WILL CRY AND MOURN THE MARTYRDOM .RASOOL (s)SAID FROM MY UMMAH A GROUP WILL EMERGE WHO WILL WEEP & MOURN . SO WHAT SHIAS DO IS A SUNNAH, THEY LOVE RASOOL(S) THEY LOVE HIS PROGENY, THEY CELEBRATE THEIR BIRTHDAYS, WEDDING DAYS AND FEED RELATIONS , POORS, ORPHANS . PEOPLETHINK AS A SUNNAH THE MORE THEY SPEND THE MORE REWARDS ARE EXPECTED . IS THERE ANY THING SERIOUSLY WRONG OR THE PROBLEM IS IN THE KAFFIRANA BRAIN OF THOSE WHO THINK THEY ARE MUSLIMS , MERRY MAKING , GOING TO CINEMA HALL ON THE DAY THE NAWASAH E RASOOL (a s ) ATTAINED MARTYRDOM ALONG WITH HIS KITH & KIN WITH A SIX MONTH OLD .
    THOSE WHO DO NOT APPROVE THIS HAVE NO CLAIM ON ISLAM .

    Reply
  21. SardarKhan

    Khomeniey is Son of boody Baqir majlasee who wrote false Boooks i just hate Shia …my mind is unable to accept that Shias are Muslims…Iran is not Islamic country…they are Blooody Parsis They worship FIRE..Go to helll Iranis you are not Muslims

    Reply
  22. SardarKhan

    Kaash me in kuttton k auladon ko us harami khomenee ki gand me daal k Time bomb sey phaar dooon..takey khominey jese soooar k bachay kabhee qayamat tak peda na hon

    Reply
  23. mary

    Al-Azhar’s fatwa on Shias.

    Statements about Shias by the Chancellor of al-Azhar University, Dr. Ahmad al-Tayyib. In an interview to Egyptian Al Neel Channel, Dr. Ahmad al-Tayyib, the Chancellor of Al-Azhar University (Egypt)

    Q. In your opinion, isn’t there any problem in Shia Beliefs?

    A. Never, 50 years ago Shaikh Mahmood Shaltoot, the then Chancellor of Al Azhar, had issued a fatwa that Shia School is the fifth Islamic School and as like as the other schools.

    Q. Our children are embracing Shia Islam, what should we do?

    A. Let them convert and to embrace Shia School. If someone leaves Maliki or Hanafi Sect, do we criticize him? These children are just leaving fourth school and join the fifth.

    Q. The Shias are becoming relatives with us and they are getting married with our children!

    A. What is wrong with this, marriage between religions is allowed.

    Q. It is said that the Shias have a different Quran!

    A. These are the myths and superstitions of the elderly women. Shia Quran has no any difference with ours, and even the script of their Quran is like our alphabet.

    Q. 23 clerics of a country (Saudi Arabia) issued a fatwa that the Shia are infidels, heretics (Kafirs)!!

    A. Al-Azhar is the only authority to issue fatwa for Muslims; therefore the above said fatwa is invalid and unreliable.

    Q. So what does the difference – being raised between the Shia and the Sunni – mean?

    A. These differences are the part of the policies of foreign powers who seek conflict between The Shia and the Sunni.

    Q. I have a very serious question that “the Shia do not accept Abu Bakr and Umar, how you can say they are Muslims?“

    A. Yes, they do not accept them. But is the belief in Abu Bakr and Umar a part of the principles of Islam? The story of Abu Bakr and Umar is historic and history has nothing to do with fundamentals of the beliefs.

    Q. (The reporter surprised by the response, asks) Shia has a fundamental problem and that is “they say that their Imam the time (امام العصر) is still alive after 1,000 years!“

    A. He may be alive, why is it not possible? But there is no reason that we – as Sunni – should believe just like them.

    Q. (Referring to Imam Mohammad Taqi al-Jawad AS, (the 9th Imam of Shias) the reporter asked) The Shias believe that one of their Imams was just eight-year old when he became Imam; is it possible that an eight-year-old child be the Imam?

    A. If an infant in a cradle can be a prophet (Issa AS), then why an eight-year-old child can not be the Imam? It is not strange. Although we may not accept this belief as we are Sunni. However, this belief does not harm their Islam, and they are Muslims.

    Translated by F.H.Mahdavimy

    Reply
  24. suni

    shia is a devil among the Muslims. They are cut the basic role of Islamic belief…
    for his own interest every thing is right ..

    Reply
  25. muhammad tahseen khan

    there was a some wrong information to zaheer hussain sahab ;basically the reality is that after the death of prophet muhammad (peace be upon him) majority of the abn-e-hashim people came to the house of hzrat fatimah (r.a) and organize yhe council (majlis) and said that the real and righteous thing is ali (r.a) is the first caliphate because he his the cousin of prophet (s.a.w.w) amd by the way that is correct for the sake of blood relation but that is not our islam any how the news will penetrate in the house of hazrat abu bakr sidique (r.a) as well as hazrat umar farooq (r.a) than they came to the house of hazrat fatima (r.a) and said a beautiful words to her that ;”i extremely glory and love on this spirit of earth only to your father prophet muhammad (s.a.w.w) also as well as you and i swear of Allah if you do not stop this council (majlis) than i will fire your house” now at evening the people of abn-e-hashim came again to the house than hazrat fatimah (r.a) said to thee people that ;”you have to finish or windup your majlis because in the early morning umar did came and said to me this and i Allah’s swear did umar said so he does it ” so this is the truth zeeshan sahab and one thing i have to mention that why Allah mention the name of uamr abu bakr ali and usman (r.a) in Companions Promised Paradise (Ashara Mubashara) tell me i hope you know that Allah is know each and everything

    Reply
    1. zaheerhusain khan

      ON ORDERS FROM THEIR FATHERS, WHEN THE RASOOL WAS IN DEEP UNCONCIUOSNESS , THEY ADMINSTERED. POISON . A KUWAIT SHEIKH HAS PROVED THIS POINT IN A CONVINSING VIDEO WITH ALL REFERENCES . AGAIN AND AGAIN THE POISIONING BY THE KHYBERS JEWS WOMEN WAS MENTIONED . DOES A LETHAL POISON GIVES 3 YEARS REMISSION . THIS INDEED WAS GUILT CONCIOUSNESS . TWO EVIL DAUGHTERS OF TWO EVIL SAHABAS WERE IN A HURRY TO ASCENT THEIR FATHERS ON THE THRONE . GREED AND LUST ARE THE WORST ENEMY OF MAN .THE BUBLE OF THE ASHRA MUBASHRA WILL BURST IN QAYAMAH BUT THEN THERE WILL BE NO ROOM FOR REPENTENCE , THEY WILL BE AND THE FIRES OF HELL WILL BE THERE EMBRACING EACH OTHER . THEN AYATOLLAH KHOMAINI WILL SMILE FROM THE PARADISE ABOVE UNDERNEATH WHICH RIVERS OF HONEY WILL FLOW . ZAHEER HUSAIN KHAN

      Reply
  26. zaheerhusain

    I HAVE SAID ENOUGH , NO MORE FOR IT IS USELESS, ALLAH HAVE PUT LOCKS ON THEIR BRAIN . THEY ARE GONE CASE, THEY ARE IN MAJORITY , SO THEY THINK MAJORITY IS ALWAYS RIGHT , BUT AL.LAH SAYS APPOSITE OF THIS IN QORA’AN . HE SAYS KASEERAN
    (majority) GOES ASTRAY , AND IT IS TRUE, JUST CAN’T BE WRONG . SO I FEEL PITY FOR THEM JUST LIKE A SURGION FEELS ONLY PITY OF A TOO ADVANCE CANSER CASE . AHLE
    SUNNAH ARE CANSER ON EARTH WHICH HAS NO CURE BUT JAHANNUM . IF THEY DON’T WANT COME OUT OF IT , LET IT BE . .

    Reply
    1. Abu Malik

      This was hot debate between shia/sunni during muharram i.e. who killed hussain[ra]?

      They accuse ahle-sunnah as nasibi. But reality is that the shia’s are pure nasibi, they are murderer of ahle-bayt.

      & now they hide this reality behind matam & mourning.

      Shia of Ali[ra] murdered hussain[ra] (shia alim debater admits): Famous Shia scholar Sayyed Kamal al Haydari admits that The Battle of Karbala was between Imam Hussein[ra] and the Shia of Ali[ra] in al Kufah, He even said The Shia of Ali[ra] wanted to come closer to Allah by spilling the blood of Hussein[ra].

      & here is the audio: [listen from minute 3 to minute 4:30]

      The Lecture has the title: Dar’e al Shubuhat ‘An Waqi’at al taff.

      لسيد كمال الحيدري: محاضرة بعنوان درء الشبهات عن واقعة الطف

      Shia Link (download quickly before they remove it):

      http://shiavoice.com/play-fex3h.html

      One of the brother uploaded it on youtube:

      This is obvious of course because you can read many texts which prove this from the Shia books:

      1. إن الحقيقة المفاجئة أننا نجد العديد من كتب الشيعة تقرر وتؤكد أن شيعة الحسين هم الذين قتلوا الحسين . فقد قال السيد محسن الأمين ” بايع الحسين عشرون ألفاً من أهل العراق ، غدروا به وخرجوا عليه وبيعته في أعناقهم وقتلوه ” { أعيان الشيعة 34:1 }.

      Al Sayyed Muhsin al Ameen says: “20,000 from the people of Iraq gave Allegiance to Hussein, then they suddenly betrayed him and rebelled against him although they had given him an oath of allegiance”

      source: A’ayan al Shia 1:34

      2. الحسين يناديهم قبل أن يقتلوه : ” ألم تكتبوا إلي أن قد أينعت الثمار ، و أنما تقدم على جند مجندة؟ تباً لكم أيها الجماعة حين على استصرختمونا والهين ، فشحذتم علينا سيفاً كان بأيدينا ، وحششتم ناراً أضرمناها على عدوكم وعدونا ، فأصبحتم ألباً أوليائكم و سحقاً ، و يداً على أعدائكم . استسرعتم إلى بيعتنا كطيرة الذباب ، و تهافتم إلينا كتهافت الفراش ثم نقضتموها سفهاً ، بعداً لطواغيت هذه الأمة ” { الاحتجاج للطبرسي }.

      Al Hussein was calling them before they killed him: ” Didn’t you write to me that the fruits had become ripe? and That I would have an enormous army when I come? Damn you! You cried for us to come then you held a sword that was once in our hands against us! (…) you were hasty in giving us Baya’ah like flies and you gathered around us like a group of butterflies But you broke your oath…”

      source: Al Ihtijaj for al Tabrasi.

      5. ويذكر المؤرخ الشيعي اليعقوبي في تاريخه أنه لما دخل علي بن الحسين الكوفة رأى نساءها يبكين ويصرخن فقال : ” هؤلاء يبكين علينا فمن قتلنا ؟ ” أي من قتلنا غيرهم { تاريخ اليعقوبي 235:1 }

      Famous Shia historian al Ya’aqoubi mentions in his Tareekh that when Ali Zain al Abideen bin al Hussein entered Kufah he saw the women crying and screaming so he said: “These women are crying because of us, Then who killed us?” [meaning who killed us except for these Shia who cry.]

      source: Tareekh al ya’aqoubi 1:235.

      Now the question is: kufa homeland of whom: shia or ahle-sunnah?

      Rafidi priest Baqir Shareef al-Qureshi said: “Verily Kufa was the birth place of shia, and a homeland of the al-Alawe’een, and it has declared its loyalty to ahlul bait many times.
      (hayat Al-Hussein 3/12)

      He also said the seed of shia was sown in Kufa since the khilafat of Umar.
      (hayat Al-Hussein 3/13)

      Comment: So it is proved that shia betrayed hussain[ra], because first they invited hussain[ra] & then betrayed him.

      Treachery of Rafidah forefathers towards al-Hasan (ra):

      A fanatic rafidi who is Edris Al-Hussein on the treachery of his forefathers said: “And Imam Hasan (as) was assassinated by element of his army.
      (Book – Hussein made me shia page 279) – شيعني الحسين ص279
      Al-Hasan said: By Allah I see Mu`awiyah better than these people, they pretend to be my partisans (Shia), they wanted to kill me, plundered and took my money….
      Source – 2/10 وهذا النص في آداب المنابر لحسن مغنية ص20
      Another rafidi who is Amir Mohd Kadhim al-Qazweni said: “Indeed the history proves to us that those who were with Al-Hasan (as), even though they were many, were treacherous and perfidious, and their number availed in nothing against his enemies. And their treachery and perfidiousness reached to an extent that they even wrote to Mu’awiya saying: “If you wish we will hand over Al-Hasan to you. And one of them stabbed Imam Al-Hasan (as) on his thigh till it reached his bone…
      Source – محاورة عقائدية ص122ـ123 . أيضاً ولاضرر يعود على المسلمين من تسليم الأمر الى معاوية .

      Source – الاحتجاج (2/32) وابن طاووس في الملهوف ص 92 والأمين في لواعج الأشجان ص 158 وعباس القمي في منتهى الآمال الجزء الأول ص 572، وحسين كوراني في رحاب كربلاء ص 183 وعبد الرزاق المقرم في مقتل الحسين ص 317 ومرتضى عياد في مقتل الحسين ص 87 وأعادها عباس القمي في نفس المهموم ص 360 وذكرها رضى القزويني في تظلم الزهراء ص 262.

      2. And when Imam Zain al-Abedin pass by, he saw people of kufa wailing and crying, so he reprimanded them saying: “You wail and cry for us, so who killed us?

      Source – لهوف ص 86 نفس المهموم 357 مقتل الحسين لمرتضى عياد ص 83 ط 4 عام 1996م تظلم الزهراء ص 257.

      3. And in another narration when he saw people of Kufa crying and wailing he said in low voice: “These people cry over us, so who killed us other than them?
      Source – الاحتجاج 2/29

      Addressing of Musa al-Kazim (ra):

      If I had to truly distinguish my Shî‘ah I would find them nothing other than pretenders. If I had to put them to the test I would only find them to be apostates. If I were to scrutinise them I would be left with only one in a thousand. Were I to sift them thoroughly I would be left with only the handful that is truly mine. They have been sitting on cushions all along, saying: ” We are the Shî‘ah of ‘Alî.”

      Source: al-Kulayni, Rawdat al-Kafi vol. 8 p. 288

      Now see actually these same shia of imam ali, [so called rafida’s] were sons of zina in view of other shia imams in shia SAHIH hadith:

      حدثني أبي رحمه الله تعالى و جماعة مشايخي عن سعد بن عبد الله عن أحمد بن محمد بن عيسى و محمد بن الحسين بن أبي الخطاب عن جعفر بن بشير عن حماد عن كليب بن معاوية عن أبي عبد الله ع قال كان قاتل يحيى بن زكريا ولد زنا و كان قاتل الحسين ع ولد زنا

      From Kulayb bin Mu`aawiyah from Abee `Abd Allaah said: “The killer of Yahya bin Zakarriya was a walad zina and the killer of Al-Hussayn was a walad zina.
      Source: Ibn Quluwayh, Kaamil Al-Ziyaarah, ch. 25, pg. 77, hadeeth # 1 & hadith is SAHIH.

      حدثني أبي رحمه الله و محمد بن الحسن عن محمد بن الحسن الصفار عن أحمد بن محمد بن عيسى عن ابن فضال عن ابن بكير عن زرارة عن عبد الخالق عن أبي عبد الله ع قال كان قاتل الحسين ع ولد زنا و قاتل يحيى بن زكريا ولد زنا

      From `Abd Al-Khaaliq (bin `Abd Rabih) from Abee `Abd Allaah said: “The killer of Al-hussayn was a walad zina and the killer of Yahya bin Zakariyya was a walad zina”
      Source: Ibn Quluwayh, Kaamil Al-Ziyaarah, ch. 25, pg. 78, hadeeth # 4 & hadith is Muwaththaq.

      Then you have al Shimr, who was he?:

      “Shimr bin Thu al Jawshan was amongst the supporters of The Caliph Ali PBUH in the battle of Siffin.”

      Shia sources: Safeenat al bihar by Sheikh al-Tusi 4/3. Bab al Sheen Ba’ad al Meem p492.

      زحربن قيس هذا شهد مع علي (ع) الجمل و صفين كما شهد صفين معه شبث بن ربعي و شمر بن ذي الجوشن الضبابي ثم حاربوا الحسين عليه السلام يوم كربلاء (من شيعة أمير المؤمنين علي ) فكانت لهم خاتمة سوء نعوذ بالله من سوء الخاتمة.

      المصدر/ في رحاب ائمة اهل‏ البيت(ع) ج 1 ص 9السيد محسن الامين الحسيني العاملي

      “This Zhr bin Qays had witnessed the battle of JAMAL and SIFFIN alongside Ameer al Mumineen Ali PBUH as well as al-Shibth bin Rab’ee and Shimr bin thu al Jawshan al Dababi, then they fought against al Hussein PBUH on the day of Karbala so they had a horrible ending and we seek refuge in Allah from such an ending”.

      source: Fi Rihab AhlulBayt 1/9 by Al Sayyed Muhsin al Ameen al Husseini al Amili.

      Reply
    2. Abu Malik

      “Shimr bin Thu al Jawshan was amongst the supporters of The Caliph Ali PBUH in the battle of Siffin.”

      Shia sources: Safeenat al bihar by Sheikh al-Tusi 4/3. Bab al Sheen Ba’ad al Meem p492.

      زحربن قيس هذا شهد مع علي (ع) الجمل و صفين كما شهد صفين معه شبث بن ربعي و شمر بن ذي الجوشن الضبابي ثم حاربوا الحسين عليه السلام يوم كربلاء (من شيعة أمير المؤمنين علي ) فكانت لهم خاتمة سوء نعوذ بالله من سوء الخاتمة.

      المصدر/ في رحاب ائمة اهل‏ البيت(ع) ج 1 ص 9السيد محسن الامين الحسيني العاملي

      “This Zhr bin Qays had witnessed the battle of JAMAL and SIFFIN alongside Ameer al Mumineen Ali PBUH as well as al-Shibth bin Rab’ee and Shimr bin thu al Jawshan al Dababi, then they fought against al Hussein PBUH on the day of Karbala so they had a horrible ending and we seek refuge in Allah from such an ending”.

      source: Fi Rihab AhlulBayt 1/9 by Al Sayyed Muhsin al Ameen al Husseini al Amili.

      Reply
  27. M Ibrahim

    The reason the shiites/sabais ridicule the Sahabaas is to instigate reciprocal hatred so that the non-shiites say something bad about Ahle Bayt in anger. But Alhamdolillah, that is not possible because the non-shiites love the Ahle Bayt more than the sabai shiites. This is Allah’s Will and this is where the sabais’ ulterior design will always fail. May Almighty guide the ignorant and reprimand those who spread fitna.

    Reply
  28. Nazim

    Khomeni, just a ordinary man. He lived as a tyrrant and died slow and painfully. And then followed the undignified funeral which shows what Allah does to those who have no value or respect for our beloved Prophet. If it was upto the Shia’s they would have declared this mad man a Prophet. Khomeni leaves no legacy accept pain and dispair in the hearts of a deceived nation. When I think about him, the only picture that comes to mind is the way he was treated during his funeral. Perhaphs this brings peace in my heart as I watch the nation trample on their so called “Imam”.

    Reply
  29. mycaxah

    khomeini the coward! his followers dont dare fight america and israel but are ready to enter into iraq, syria and lebanon. what a coward!
    and by the way if the Prophet S.A.W could be poisoned why not Ali R.A? or does that mean Ali was more powerful than the Prophet S.A.W?

    Reply
  30. Abu Malik

    The pagan polytheist Khomeini says that all the atoms in the universe humble themselves before the twelve Imams and it is one of the essential beliefs of the Shī‘i school that no one can attain the spiritual status of the Imāms, not even the cherubim or the prophets.

    Congratulations, this pagan’s Tawheed is as monotheistic as the Tawheed of the Hindus und Qurayshi Mushriks back then (i.e. Rafidi Shi’ism does not fulfil the Tawheed Uloohiyyah (Uluhiyyah – Oneness of Allah, that’s what all religions and cults lack, yet Rafidi Shi’ism even lack the Tawheed Rububiyyah i.e. LORDSHIP.)

    Ayatul-Khomeini in “Al Hukuma al Islamiyah” – Manshourat al Maktabah al Islamiya al Kubrah – Page 52, He says:

    “To prove that government and authority belong to the Imām (‘a) is not to imply that the Imām (‘a) has no spiritual status. The Imām (‘a) does indeed possess certain spiritual dimensions that are unconnected with their function as a ruler. The spiritual status of the Imām (‘a) is a universal divine viceregency that is sometimes mentioned by the Imāms (‘a). It is a viceregency pertaining to the whole of creation, by virtue of which all the atoms in the universe humble themselves before the holder of authority. It is one of the essential beliefs of our Shī‘i school that no one can attain the spiritual status of the Imāms, not even the cherubim or the prophets. In fact, according to the traditions that have been handed down to us, the Most Noble Messenger and the Imāms (‘a) existed before the creation of the world in the form of lights situated beneath the divine throne; they were superior to other men even in the sperm from which they grow and in their physical composition. Their exalted station is limited only by the divine will, as indicated by the saying of Jibrā’īl (‘a) recorded in the traditions on the mi‘rāj: “Were I to draw closer by as much as the breadth of a finger, surely I would burn.” The Prophet (s) himself said: “We have states with God that are beyond the reach of the cherubim and the prophets.”

    ^ Pure Zandaqah (heresy), but are his blind followers going to ponder over it?

    https://sonsofsunnah.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/khomine_imams.jpg?w=988&h=1200

    Reply
  31. Abu Malik

    The pagan polytheist Khomeini says that all the atoms in the universe humble themselves before the twelve Imams and it is one of the essential beliefs of the Shī‘i school that no one can attain the spiritual status of the Imāms, not even the cherubim or the prophets.

    Congratulations, this pagan’s Tawheed is as monotheistic as the Tawheed of the Hindus und Qurayshi Mushriks back then (i.e. Rafidi Shi’ism does not fulfil the Tawheed Uloohiyyah (Uluhiyyah – Oneness of Allah, that’s what all religions and cults lack, yet Rafidi Shi’ism even lack the Tawheed Rububiyyah i.e. LORDSHIP.)

    Ayatul-Khomeini in “Al Hukuma al Islamiyah” – Manshourat al Maktabah al Islamiya al Kubrah – Page 52, He says:

    “To prove that government and authority belong to the Imām (‘a) is not to imply that the Imām (‘a) has no spiritual status. The Imām (‘a) does indeed possess certain spiritual dimensions that are unconnected with their function as a ruler. The spiritual status of the Imām (‘a) is a universal divine viceregency that is sometimes mentioned by the Imāms (‘a). It is a viceregency pertaining to the whole of creation, by virtue of which all the atoms in the universe humble themselves before the holder of authority. It is one of the essential beliefs of our Shī‘i school that no one can attain the spiritual status of the Imāms, not even the cherubim or the prophets. In fact, according to the traditions that have been handed down to us, the Most Noble Messenger and the Imāms (‘a) existed before the creation of the world in the form of lights situated beneath the divine throne; they were superior to other men even in the sperm from which they grow and in their physical composition. Their exalted station is limited only by the divine will, as indicated by the saying of Jibrā’īl (‘a) recorded in the traditions on the mi‘rāj: “Were I to draw closer by as much as the breadth of a finger, surely I would burn.” The Prophet (s) himself said: “We have states with God that are beyond the reach of the cherubim and the prophets.”

    ^ Pure Zandaqah (heresy), but are his blind followers going to ponder over it?
    https://sonsofsunnah.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/khomine_imams.jpg?w=988&h=1200

    Reply
  32. Mustafa Abul-Qasim

    The pagan polytheist Khomeini says that all the atoms in the universe humble themselves before the twelve Imams and it is one of the essential beliefs of the Shī‘i school that no one can attain the spiritual status of the Imāms, not even the cherubim or the prophets.

    Congratulations, this pagan’s Tawheed is as monotheistic as the Tawheed of the Hindus und Qurayshi Mushriks back then (i.e. Rafidi Shi’ism does not fulfil the Tawheed Uloohiyyah (Uluhiyyah – Oneness of Allah, that’s what all religions and cults lack, yet Rafidi Shi’ism even lack the Tawheed Rububiyyah i.e. LORDSHIP.)

    Ayatul-Khomeini in “Al Hukuma al Islamiyah” – Manshourat al Maktabah al Islamiya al Kubrah – Page 52, He says:

    “To prove that government and authority belong to the Imām (‘a) is not to imply that the Imām (‘a) has no spiritual status. The Imām (‘a) does indeed possess certain spiritual dimensions that are unconnected with their function as a ruler. The spiritual status of the Imām (‘a) is a universal divine viceregency that is sometimes mentioned by the Imāms (‘a). It is a viceregency pertaining to the whole of creation, by virtue of which all the atoms in the universe humble themselves before the holder of authority. It is one of the essential beliefs of our Shī‘i school that no one can attain the spiritual status of the Imāms, not even the cherubim or the prophets. In fact, according to the traditions that have been handed down to us, the Most Noble Messenger and the Imāms (‘a) existed before the creation of the world in the form of lights situated beneath the divine throne; they were superior to other men even in the sperm from which they grow and in their physical composition. Their exalted station is limited only by the divine will, as indicated by the saying of Jibrā’īl (‘a) recorded in the traditions on the mi‘rāj: “Were I to draw closer by as much as the breadth of a finger, surely I would burn.” The Prophet (s) himself said: “We have states with God that are beyond the reach of the cherubim and the prophets.”

    ^ Pure Zandaqah (heresy), but are his blind followers going to ponder over it?
    https://sonsofsunnah.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/khomine_imams.jpg?w=988&h=1200

    Reply
  33. Mustafa Abul-Qasim

    Khomeini, the mushrik billah says that RABB/LORD (which ALWAYS stands for Allah/God in arabic) means IMAM!!!

    Imam [of Kufr and Zandaqah/heresy] Khomeini and the explanation of the verse [13:2].

    “… Allah had said : “He doth regulate all affairs, explaining the signs in detail, that ye may believe with certainty in the meeting with your Lord.” This means your Lord who is the IMAM so look at the wisdom and perfection of Allah’s words …”

    Source: Misbah al hidayah Ila al khilafah wal Wilyah, Imam Khomeini, Sayyed Ahmad al fahri, Al Wafa’a beirut Lebanon, Page 145.

    https://sonsofsunnah.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/khomainy41.jpg?w=820&h=300

    Reply
  34. Mustafa Abul-Qasim

    zaheerhusain

    You Rafidhi Batini SafavI Majoosi Yahudi Imbecile! You can rot in hell with your Ruhudajjal Ayatullat Khomeini, you follower of a barbaric , savage , Arab Murdering, Hebrew Speaking, Jewish-law ruling hidden Dajjal who will be killed by a bearded woman!

    Reply
  35. Abuyahya kath

    Only a Yahoodi would have conflict with Imam Khomeini r.a as he raised the head of Islam high as a real successor of Rasool saww Ali a.s did. There are only Brothers of Yahoo!’s wahibis najdis who cannot tolerate the real Islam. May Allah punish and perish the people who creat corruption on earth here and hereafter.
    Ameen ya Rabal aalameen.

    Reply
  36. Searchingthetruth

    Gosh so much anger and hatred – everyone on here is ready to call the other one jannami as though Allah swt has given humans full rights to decide who goes to heaven or hell – but this right is only and only Allah’s
    And He decides who goes to hell or heaven – He is most merciful. We must all fear Allah and refrain from calling each other jahannami Astaghfirullah
    We were all made from sperm and we will all blend with dust and what we will take with us is ikhlaq which sadly is missing from the Ummah

    Let’s do our job – maintain our own ikhlaq and control our temper and tongue
    And let Allah do His job – decide between who is wrong and right – He is Adil and Wise

    If there’s anything in common between Sunni and Shia – it is the love of all the prophets, Quran, Kaaba . Holy prophet Muhammad sawas and his pure family
    I’m sure that’s enough grounds under which we can stay united
    The only ones I see dividing the ummah are those who are ready to call each other kaafir – Astaghfirullah
    Let’s do our job – ask Allah to instill love tolerance patience and forgiveness in our hearts ameen

    And remember just if somebody hates sahaba t doesn’t make them kaafir – definition of Muslim is someone who believes in Allah and His Messenger and Quran

    A lot of speculation and assumptions have been written by people on this webpage – may Allah remove this disrespectful and disgraceful manners from all of us

    Reply
  37. Antonio Cyr

    The way a person dies, will be raised in the same state… So remember how he died??? fell on the ground, lying nude, his followers nudge his body which has scratches on it…. Still you don’t get and will not….

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s